Evaluation of Learning Outcome: The Comparison Between the Education Unit Level Curriculum (KTSP) and the 2013 Curriculum

  • Rusydi Ananda State Islamic University of North Sumatera

Abstract

This study aimed to describe the comparative implementation of learning outcome evaluations applied at MTsN 1 Medan by using the 2013 KTSP and Curriculum 2013. The method used in this study was qualitative methodology. Data collection techniques consisted of observation, interviews, and documentation. The research findings indicated that the differences in the assessment of learning outcomes between the KTSP curriculum and 2013 curriculum include aspects of the application in the classroom, assessment aspects, aspects of the assessment system, aspects of assessment instruments, aspects of portfolio assessment concepts, aspects of report card format, aspects of value list format, aspects of competency achievement indicators, aspects of competency achievement indicators, aspects graduate competency standards, standard aspects of assessment and aspects of value ranges.

References

Ananda, R. (2018). The Effectiveness of the Implementation of the Case Methods in the Learning Evaluation Course at the State Islamic University of North Sumatera. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 6(1), 103-120. doi:10.26811/peuradeun.v6i1.171
Anderson, O.W. danKrathwohl, D.R. (2001) A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, New York; Longman.
Arikunto, Suharsimi. (2010). Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Ed. Revisi. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Hamalik, Oemar. (2014). Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Idris, S., Tabrani ZA, & Sulaiman, F. (2018). Critical Education Paradigm in the Perspective of Islamic Education. Advanced Science Letters, 24(11), 8226–8230. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2018.12529
Kunandar. (2007). Guru Profesional, Implementasi KTSP dan Persiapan Menghadapi Sertifikasi Guru. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Miles Matthew B. & Huberman A. Michael, (2002) Analisis Data Kualitatif: Buku Sumber tentang Metode-Metode Baru, Trans. Tjejep Rohendi Rohidi. Jakarta: UI Press.
Mulyasa, E. (2007). Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan, Suatu Panduan Praktis.Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Mulyasa, E. (2015)., Pengembangan dan Implementasi Kurikulum 2013, Bandung: Rosda Karya.
Musdiani, M. (2018). The Influence of Problem-Based Learning Model on Learning IPS. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 6(2), 267-276. doi:10.26811/peuradeun.v6i2.220
Mustapha, R., M. Nasir, M., & Sadrina, S. (2018). Project-Based Learning Evaluation from Students’ and Supervisors’ Perspectives: A Qualitative Research at Polytechnic Malaysia. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 6(3), 397-408. doi:10.26811/peuradeun.v6i3.238
Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional, Nomor 23 Tahun 2006, Tentang Standar Kompetensi Lulusan untuk Satuan Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Jakarta: Kemendiknas.
Thoha, Chabib. (2001). Teknik Evaluasi Pendidikan.Jakarta: Rajawali.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 14 Tahun 2005 Tentang Guru Dan Dosen
Yaumi, Muhamad. (2013). Prinsip-Prinsip Desain Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Kencana.
Published
2021-05-30
How to Cite
ANANDA, Rusydi. Evaluation of Learning Outcome: The Comparison Between the Education Unit Level Curriculum (KTSP) and the 2013 Curriculum. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, [S.l.], v. 9, n. 2, p. 365-378, may 2021. ISSN 2443-2067. Available at: <http://journal.scadindependent.org/index.php/jipeuradeun/article/view/510>. Date accessed: 25 sep. 2021. doi: https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v9i2.510.