Plantation Sector Policy Governance by the Regional Government of Riau Province (Leading Commodities Study)
Abstract
This study tried to analyze the problems of the plantation sector in Riau Province from the point of view of governance policies carried out by the Riau Provincial government. Palm oil is still a leading commodity in Riau Province. This research problem focused on the governance of oil palm plantation policies in Riau Province as the first strategic issue. The added value of oil palm plantations had yet to improve the community's economy due to the slow downstream program. This study used the concept of governance, consisting of three dimensions: actor, structural, and empirical. Using qualitative research methods, this study concluded that the first dimension influences the policy governance of the oil palm plantation sector: actors were dominated by entrepreneurs, totaling 233 companies from an area of 1.569 million hectares. The two structural dimensions were dominated by six environmental studies on the management of oil palm plantation policies and the realization of the Riau Province APBD budget structure. The three empirical dimensions were dominated by land destruction and land conflicts for oil palm plantations, which impact the policies of the regional government of Riau Province.
References
Bowen, G., A. (2009). Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40.
Craps, M., Vermeesch, I., Dewulf, A., Sips, K., Termeer, K., & Bouwen, R. (2019). A Relational Approach to Leadership for Multi-Actor Governance. Administrative Sciences, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci9010012
Dwipayana, A. A. G. N. Ari dan Eko, S. (2003). Membangun Good Governance di Desa. Yogyakarta. Institute for Research and Empowerment.
Emmet, D. (2017). The concept of power. Paradigms of Political Power, pp. 78–104. https://doi.org/10.7312/popi17594-004
Fabiana Meijon Fadul. (2019). Kajian Pengembangan Desa Mandiri Energi. 27–56.
Goenadi. D. H., Drajat. B., Erningpraja. L., H. B. (2005). Prospek dan Arah Pengembangan Agribisnis Kakao di Indonesia. Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pertanian Departemen Pertanian, 1–50.
Grant Lewis, S., & Naidoo, J. (2004). Whose Theory of Participation? School Governance Policy and Practice in South Africa. Current Issues in Comparative Education, 100–112.
Hidayat, R. (2014). Analisis Komoditas Unggulan Sub Sektor Perkebunan di Kabupaten Bengkayang Provinsi Kalimantan Barat. Jurnal Social Economic of Agriculture, 2(1), 54–66. https://doi.org/10.26418/j.sea.v2i1.5119
Hufty, M. (2011). Investigating Policy Processes: The Governance Analytical Framework (GAF). Research for Sustainable Development: Foundations, Experiences, and Perspectives, pp. 403–424.
Hydén, G., & Bratton, M. (Eds. ). (1992). Governance and Politics in Africa. L. Rienner. L. Rienner.
Hyden, G. (1992). Governance and the Study of Politics, in G. Hyden and M. Bratton (eds) Governance and Politics in Africa, Boulder: Lynn Reiner.
Kimenyi, M. S. (2006). Ethnicity, Governance, and the Provision of Public Goods. Journal of African Economies, 15(SUPPL. 1), 62–99. https://doi.org/10.1093/jae/ejk006
Mukhlis, M., Nazsir, N., Rahmatunnisa, M., & Yani Yuningsih, N. (2018). The Actor Domination in the Collaborative Governance in the Lampung Province Central Government Displacement Policy: An Ambivalent. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 6(3), 507-524. https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v6i3.272
Nasution, A. P., Wibowo, E. A., Ramdani, R., & Rofiqah, T. (2021). Urgensity of Environmental Management System Implementation on Oil Palm Plantation Management Policies in North Sumatera. Journal of Social Transformation and Regional Development, 03(01), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.30880/jstard.2021.03.01.001
Nurfatriani, F., Ramawati, Sari, G. K., & Komarudin, H. (2019). Optimization of Crude Palm Oil Fund to Support Smallholder Oil Palm Replanting in Reducing Deforestation in Indonesia. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(18). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11184914
Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods: Integrating Theory and Practice. Sage publications.
Reddy, S., Allan, S., Coghlan, S., & Cooper, P. (2020). A Governance Model for the Application of AI in Health Care. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 27(3), 491–497. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocz192
Richards, D., & Smith, M. J. (2002). Governance and Public Policy in the United Kingdom. Oxford University Press.
Rochman, G. M. (2000). Good Governance. Prinsip, Komponen, dan Penerapanya dalam Hak Asasi Manusia (Penyelenggaraan Negara Yang Baik). Penerbit Komnas HAM.
Sari, D. A. A. (2019). Integrasi Tata Kelola Kebijakan Pembangunan Kelautan Berkelanjutan (Governance Management Policy Integration For Sustainable Marine Development). Jurnal Rechtsvinding, 8(2), 153.
Smith, B. (2007). Good Governance and Development. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-06218-5
Suprihatini, R., Drajat, B., & Fajar, U. (2017). Kebijakan Percepatan Pengembangan Industri Hilir Perkebunan: Kasus Teh dan Sawit. Analisis Kebijakan Pertanian, 2(1), 54–66.
Syahputra, E., -, S., & Dian, S. (2012). Weeds Assessment di Perkebunan Kelapa Sawit Lahan Gambut. Perkebunan dan Lahan Tropika, 1(1), 37. https://doi.org/10.26418/plt.v1i1.120
Syahza, A. (2013). Potensi Pengembangan Industri Kelapa Sawit 1. J. Penelitian MP3EI, 1(1), 1–10.
Tando, C., Sudarmo, S., & Haryanti, R. (2021). Conflict Resolution in the Performance of Collaborative Governance: A Systematic Literature Review. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 9(1), 161-178. https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v9i1.486
Turner, M., & Hulme, D. (1997). Decentralization within the State: Good Theory but Poor Practice? Governance, Administration and Development, 151–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25675-4_7
Weiss, T. G. (2012). Governance, Good Governance, and Global Governance: Conceptual and actual challenges. Thinking about Global Governance: Why People and Ideas Matter, April 2013, pp. 168–189. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203807057-19
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: (1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC-BY-SA) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal; (2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal; (3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
