Good Governance in Corporate Social Responsibility (C.S.R.) Program at Siak Regency

The fundamental problem of this research is the lack of transparency and accountability of the Regional Development Planning Agency (BAPPEDA) with P.T.IKPP disseminates the corporate social responsibility (C.S.R.) program to the people of the Siak Regency. This study aimed to determine the implementation of good governance in the corporate social responsibility (C.S.R.) program by the Regional Development Planning Agency (BAPPEDA) in Siak Regency. The research method used in this study uses a qualitative method with a purposive sampling technique. The study results indicated that good governance in the corporate social responsibility (C.S.R.) program is not running optimally due to the incompatibility between implementation in the field and the principles used in good governance, namely participation, transparency, accountability, and the rule of law. This study's conclusion showed the lack of collaboration from BAPPEDA with all stakeholders involved in providing reports on planned programs and even those that have been realized. Accountability and transparency activities were less than optimal in socializing with the people of Siak Regency. This research suggests that P.T. IKPP maximizes its role in providing information to the people of the Siak Regency. BAPPEDA must further increase its duties in supervising the company's implementation of C.S.R. in the community.


A. Introduction
The governance development in the regions has now evolved to a more open government, marked by a model of developing cooperation from the local (regional) to international levels. Simultaneously, the community's demands for the quality of public services and the demands for improving welfare are also increasing. Corporate social responsibility (C.S.R.) is a corporate social program to provide assistance and empower communities around the company as a form of social responsibility or compensation for various things lost to the community due to the company's operations. (Retnaningsih, 2015).
In realizing good governance, local governments can cooperate with the private sector in the regions. Before local governments cooperate with the private sector, local governments have rights and obligations.
C.S.R. governance has not collaborated between various interrelated parties (Furqoni & Rosyadi, 2019). Corporate Social Responsibility (C.S.R.) is one of the obligations that the company must carry out. C.S.R. has been strictly regulated in Indonesia, namely in Law Number 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies (Kusuma & Ginting, 2021). In recent years, many companies have realized the importance of implementing corporate social responsibility (C.S.R.) programs as part of their business strategy (Sudana & Arlindania, 2011).
The collaboration can be in the form of a program run by a company, namely a C.S.R. program run by P.T. Indah Kiat Pulp & Paper,in collaboration with the Siak Regency local government. It is in charge of the program to supervise the implementation of C.S.R. Here, the government that plays a role or participates in the company's C.S.R. program policies, namely BAPPEDA (Regional Development Planning Agency). Where BAPPEDA (Regional Development Planning Agency) supervises the course of C.S.R. program activities carried out by a company or not by applicable regulations.
On the other hand, the company also must carry out Corporate Social Responsibility activities (from now on, abbreviated as C.S.R.) as a follow-up to social responsibility to the community. (Makhfudloh et al., 2018).

JIP-The Indonesian Journal of the Social Sciences {767
The concept of C.S.R. in Indonesia has gained legal legitimacy to be implemented by private companies and state-owned enterprises (BUMN). (Disemadi & Prananingtyas, 2020). G.C.G. and C.S.R. are interrelated phenomena; companies must improve compliance with the law and develop policies for implementing C.S.R. activities (Ramdhaningsih, 2013).
The idea of C.S.R. emphasizes that corporate responsibility is no longer just looking for profit but also social and environmental responsibility (Marnelly, 2012). Corporate Social Responsibility (C.S.R.) is an idea that makes companies no longer faced with responsibilities based on a single bottom line (Safitri & Rustiana, 2019). The implementation of disclosure of Good Corporate Governance (G.C.G.) and Corporate Social Responsibility (C.S.R.) is one way to increase the value of the company by focusing on the balance of internal and external interests (Worokinasih & Zaini, 2020 responsibilities of employees and their families, the government, local community companies, and the wider community (Nayenggita et al., 2019).
Corporate governance is one of the key elements in increasing economic efficiency, which includes a series of relationships between company management, the Board of commissioners, shareholders, and other stakeholders (Asiah et al., 2021).
There is still a lack of socialization provided by the company P.T.

Indah Kiat Pulp & Paper and the Tualang District provide information
about the program to be implemented in the surrounding community so that only a few people can enjoy and participate. It should be the obligation of the company and the sub-district to carry out socialization properly, namely widely and thoroughly, so that the information is evenly distributed and all feel fair about the program provided by the company.
The implementation of corporate social responsibility is compensation for the adverse impact of business activities on the environment and society (Saputra et al., 2019). Corporate Social Responsibility moderates the relationship between profitability and firm value, and Good Corporate Governance moderates the relationship between profitability and firm value (Mufidah & Purnamasari, 2018).
C.S.R. is intended to encourage the business world to be more ethical in carrying out its activities so that it does not hurt society and the environment (Rohmah, 2016).
Recently, the discourse on corporate social responsibility (C.S.R.) has emerged. The discourse arose based on the thought that the existence of a company cannot be separated from its environment (Yuliana et al., 2008).
Based on stakeholder theory, C.S.R. disclosure can affect the company's value because companies think about the welfare of stakeholders (Dina et al., 2020). Companies are increasingly paying attention to their social responsibilities (Muhlis & Gultom, 2021). The concept of social sustainability emerged as a continuation of the concepts of economic sustainability and environmental sustainability that had been initiated previously (Anatan, 2009).

JIP-The Indonesian Journal of the Social Sciences {769
The government lacks maximum responsibility in implementing C.S.R. in companies, including its role or main tasks and functions that have not been clearly stated in regional regulations that make the benchmark in implementing C.S.R. It should be clearly stated in the regulations regarding the main tasks and functions of the government, namely the supervision of C.S.R. so that implementation in the area is balanced and the government is clear about its duties in implementing the C.S.R. program.  (Trisnawati, 2014). some factors affect the value of the company, including financial performance, Good Corporate Governance (G.C.G.), and Corporate Social Responsibility (C.S.R.) of a company (Yendrawati & Pratidina, 2013).
Conceptually, this research will use the concept of good governance.
According to (Smith, 2007), there are 10 (ten) good governance agendas, namely accountability, human rights, the rule of law, decentralization of political power, political pluralism, participation, eradication of corruption, transparent, efficient, and economic reform. Of the 10 indicators offered by (Smith, 2007) so the researcher only uses 4 indicators that are most relevant to the research problem, while four indicators include: accountability, the rule of law, participation, and transparency.

B. Method
The method used in this study is qualitative because, empirically, the problems that occur are more appropriate if analyzed from the perspective of qualitative research. According to (Cresswell, 2015), qualitative research means exploring and understanding the meaning of individual and group behavior and describing social or human problems.
The research process includes making research questions and procedures that are still tentative, collecting data on participant settings, analyzing data inductively, building partial data into themes, and then providing interpretations of the meaning of the data.
To measure this research, the authors will do this: carried out under natural conditions (as opposed to an experiment), researchers go directly to the data source, and researchers are small instruments. Natural conditions are conditions as they are; researchers do not carry out treatments that can affect the science of the object under study. Qualitative research is more descriptive than other research. The data is in words or image sources, so it does not emphasize numbers. The data collected after being analyzed is then described so that others easily understand it.

C. Result and Discussion
The C.S.R. program is an activity carried out by the private sector.
This program aims to assist local governments in developing and prospering the company's community. To see the answers from the informants and key informants in this study will be described as follows:

Participation
Participation is the involvement of the community, government, or other sectors in making decisions or policies directly or indirectly through representative institutions that can channel their aspirations. This participation can be seen from the involvement of the government, companies, and the community. With this participation, it is also possible to see the development of the parties participating each year, whether there is an increase or not in the program process being implemented.
Significant participation or involvement between the government, the private sector and the community that forms effective and efficient cooperation can form good governance, often called good governance.
Suppose the government and the private sector are always involved in this program. Implementing this program is good because involving other parties can create balanced and non-overlapping governance.
The results of the author's interview with the Head of the Regional Development Planning Agency of Siak Regency stated, "How many times has Bappeda participated in the C.S.R. program created by P.T.?IKPP, but the involvement of Bappeda here is still minimal. Bappeda is involved when submitting a report because Bappeda here functions as monitoring or supervising companies that run the C.S.R. program". planning. the budget needed in this C.S.R. program is in accordance with the MSME sector itself".
Then in an interview with the Secretary of the Tualang District.
Head said: "The participation or involvement of the sub-district, such as from the company submitting a proposal to the sub-district, this proposal contains program offers the company will carry out in the Tualang area.
Then the company informed them to hold a meeting with village interests to provide information about what C.S.R. programs will be implemented and given to the community." The author's interview with the C.S.R. Program Executor at P.T. IKPP Tualang said: "P.T. IKPP often involves the community in implementing C.S.R. programs, and community participation such as providing programs that will be carried out by companies such as training programs for farmers, and apprenticeship training programs for unemployed students. All of that is given so the community can feel the C.S.R. program scheduled every year.
P.T. IKPP also includes the government, especially the central government.
Because here they ask for help from experts in their fields, and they come from the central government".
From the interview with the informan above, the writer can explain that this indicator is not implemented optimally; the author says this is because several factors cause it, namely starting from participation or involvement from the government; the company does not optimally carry out Bappeda. The company only involves the sub-district more often in the process. This activity has become the responsibility of the Regency because the forum that accommodates C.S.R. is on the side of the Siak Regency, namely Bappeda. However, to involve the community in planning the implementation of the C.S.R. program that will be carried out, the surrounding community has been involved. With the increased participation from the community, it can be said that the program has been running well and properly. Because the program created is intended for the people who live around the company.
Increasing the number of people participating in a company can provide success for the government and the company to gain public trust.
From the explanation above, the author can explain that regarding.
The company and the sub-district know whether the number of people participating in the C.S.R. program carried out by P.T. IKPP has increased or decreased. Then the informants also added that community participation increases yearly because this program has been scheduled yearly. So people need the program, and they are competing to follow every program the company implements. The program provided by the company is educational or empowering the surrounding community so that the community feels helped and has been provided with the training provided through the C.S.R. program.

Transparency
Transparency is freedom in obtaining information and policies related to the public interest. Transparency here also has a vital role in a program because with this transparency; it can assess how an Agency or organization provides convenience for a group or individual to obtain information.
Such as openness regarding information or policies orreporting issues that are part of an agency. Some government agencies or companies cannot provide actual information to the public, individuals, or groups.
Ease of obtaining information is essential for stakeholders or the community as long as the information is not confidential and is detrimental to several parties. Ease of access can be in the form of coming obtain information about C.S.R., you must directly ask the company, either via telephone, or submit a proposal." The interview with the Secretary of the Tualang District Head also added: "Regarding access to C.S.R. information, such as a website, there is currently no information available, only all the information that we want to get about programs that are already running and for the future has been exposed to the Musrembang forum. But for the community around the company, it may be straightforward to access information compared to ordinary people who do not know anything about the C.S.R. program." The results of the author's interview with the Deputy in Implementing C.S.R. of PT. IKPP said, "for easy access, there is no access to information about C.S.R. programs online. However, manual access can be reached from the musrembang forum". While the results of the author's interview with the community around the company, namely Sudartono said, "It is difficult to obtain C.S.R. programs that will be implemented or planned, but information about programs that are already running can be obtained through online searching." From the results of interviews with all of the informants above, the authors can describe that easy access to online corporate C.S.R.
information is unavailable because the Regency does not yet have its provides reports on programs that will be implemented and reports on programs that have been well realized, but sometimes the private sector is slow to provide reports so that it gets a warning from the regent." Then in an interview with the Secretary of the Tualang District.
Head, the author, obtained information that: "Regarding whether the private sector makes a report to the sub-district, there is, but the report was carried out by holding a meeting with members of the C.S.R.
implementer and the penghulu and other stakeholders in the village. The program planned carried out at the beginning last year, the implementation and finally a report on the program has been realized at the end of the year".
From the interview results with existing informants, it can be described that the company provides reports on implemented programs that have not been said to be going well due to negligence on the part of the company. However, this difference of opinion occurs because the company in providing reports, whether it is a report on the program to be implemented or the program that has been realized, has been given to the government.
The informants also considered that they had given reports at the meeting at the Musrembang forum with village interests. However, for the author, the report should be submitted at the end of the year, but many negligent companies not submitted the report until the end of the year.

Accountability
Accountability means that every activity and the final result of state administration activities must be accountable to the community or the people as the holder of the highest sovereignty of the state by the provisions of the applicable laws and regulations.
Accountability here also plays a vital role because, with accountability, an agency or the private sector can be held accountable for all policies they have implemented. It needs to be considered in its implementation, lest the program's implementation fails just because it is not by the implementation mechanism and does not pay attention to what is needed from the community. Because what is needed here is direct commitment and awareness from the company.

Rules of Law
The rule of law is a legal legalism that contains the idea that justice can be served by creating an objective, impartial, impersonal, and autonomous system of rules and procedures. Therefore, the rule of law is fundamental in government because it can regulate a government agency, policy, or program by the private and private sectors. conveyed (Ansell, Chris & Gash, 2007).

D. Conclusion
The author expressly provides a research argument based on observations and observations of research in the field that to implement C.S.R. programs in Siak Regency; it is not enough just to use the concept of good governance but also must be combined with the concept of Collaborative governance because there are far more actors involved, namely the existence of government actors. The private sector, the community, the academic world, and N.G.O.s observing the company align with what is conveyed.