Ideological Conflict in Rembang (Case Study: Cement Mining Conflict in Rembang)
Abstract
The ongoing conflict in Watuhputih has escalated into a contentious and complex issue that continues to capture public attention. The debates have given rise to a fierce clash of ideas, concepts, and interpretations of laws, ultimately leading to numerous lawsuits. This study uses a qualitative research approach with Wehr and Bartos analysis to analyze conflict dynamics in the cement factory conflict case in Rembang, Central Java. The qualitative method used a case study. Data collection techniques used in-depth interviews with sources from 20 informants and documentation from various mass media. The results of this study indicate that conflict dynamics are divided into pre-conflict, confrontation, and crisis. This study concludes that the conflict in Rembang has turned into an ideological conflict. Each group claims that the ideology understood the most correct between environmental sustainability, traditional and modern, capitalist. A dark history of conflict and prolonged dynamics causes ideological conflicts. The record of the conflict’s journey into a social movement in Rembang is a series of conflicts between the community and small-scale mining companies previously in conflict areas from the 90th year.
References
Astuti, E.Z.L. (2012). Konflik Pasir Besi: Pro dan Kontra Rencana Penambangan Pasir Besi Di Kabupaten Kulon Progo. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik, 16(1), 62–74. https://doi.org/10.22146/jsp.10912.
Bartos dan Wher. (2003). Using Conflict Theory. New York. Cambridge University Press.
Bebbington, A., & Williams, M. (2008). Water and mining conflicts in Peru. Mountain Research and Development, 28(3–4), 190–195. https://doi.org/10.1659/mrd.1039.
Cheshire, L., Everingham, J.A., & Lawrence, G. (2014). Governing the Impacts of Mining and the Impacts of Mining Governance: Challenges for Rural and Regional Local Governments in Australia. Journal of Rural Studies, 36, 330–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2013.10.010.
Holden, W.N. & Jacobson, R.D.V. (2008). Civil Society Opposition to Nonferrous Metals Mining in Guatemala. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 19(4), 325-350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-008-9073-9.
Liliweri, A. (2001). Gatra-gatra Komunikasi antar Budaya. Pustaka Pelajar.
Limakrisna, N. (2011). Konflik Dalam Hubungan Industrial Ditinjau Dari Aspek Sosiologi Industri: Suatu Survey Pada Industri Garmen di Kabupaten Bandung. Sosiohumaniora, 13(3), 327-343. https://doi.org/10.24198/sosiohumaniora.v13i3.5511.
Mària SJ, J.F., & Devuyst, E. (2011). CSR and Development: A mining Company in Africa. Journal of Management Development, 30(10), 955–967. https://doi.org/10.1108/02621711111182475.
Ngadisah. (2003). Konflik Pembangunan dan Gerakan Sosial Politik di Papua. Yogyakarta.
Nurjaya, N. I. (2008). Negara, Masyarakat Adat dan Kearifan Lokal. Instrans Publishing.
Puryanto, S., Hariyadi, A., & Shofwani, S.A. (2018). Pemahaman (Learning To Know) Konflik dan Malfungsi Agen Sebagai Substansi Pendidikan Konflik dalam Kasus Konflik Pabrik Semen di Rembang Jawa Tengah. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 10(1), 1427–1442. https://ejournal.stkippacitan.ac.id/ojs3/index.php/jpp/article/view/186/143.
Puryanto, S. & S. (2019). Urban Social Movement in Indonesia. International Journal of Sciences and Research (Ponte Journal), 75(1), 124–140.
Puryanto, S., Setyowati, D,L., & Jazuli, M. (2018). Factors of Cement Mining Conflict in Rembang Central Java Indonesia; The Stages of Conflict, Emerging to Social Movements. https://doi.org/10.1163/j.ctt1w76x39.20.
Puryanto, S. (2018). Factors Mining Conflict; Local Perception (Cement Mining Conflict in Rembang Central Java Indonesia). International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 7(11), 1356–1359.
Saenz, C. (2019). A Social Conflict Diagnostic tool for Application in the Mining Industry: A Case Study in Peru. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(3), 690-700. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1714.
Sidik Puryanto, D. S. (2019). Konflik dan Gerakan Sosial di Rembang (Pertarungan Ekonomi Politik dan Lingkungan). Ombak.
Silaen Victor. (2006). Gerakan Sosial Baru: Perlawanan Komunitas Lokal Pada Kasus Indranayon Di Toba Samosir. Jogjakarta: IRE Press.
Simon Fisher, Jawed Ludin, Steve Williams, Dekha Ibrahim Abdi, Richard Smith, S. W. (2001). Mengelola Konflik: Keterampilan & Strategi untuk Bertindak. Jakarta: The British Council.
Suharko, S. (2013). Di Tambang atau di Lestarikan, Konflik Sosial Rencana Pembangunan Semen di Pati Jawa Tengah. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Politik, 17(2), 163-179. https://www.neliti.com/publications/37787/karst-ditambang-atau-dilestarikan-konflik-sosial-rencana-pembangunan-pabrik-seme#cite.
Suharko, S. (2016). Masyarakat Adat versus Korporasi: Konflik Sosial Rencana Pembangunan Pabrik Semen di Kabupaten Pati Jawa Tengah Periode 2013-2016. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Politik, 20(2), 97-116. https://doi.org/10.22146/jsp.24776.
Susan, N. (2009). Sosiologi Konflik. PRENADAMEDIA GROUP.
Sutrisno, M. dan P. H. (2005). Teori-teori Kebudayaan. Kanisius.
Zhang, A., & Moffat, K. (2015). A Balancing Act: The Role of Benefits, Impacts and Confidence in Governance in Predicting Acceptance of Mining in Australia. Resources Policy, 44, 25–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2015.01.001.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: (1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC-BY-SA) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal; (2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal; (3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).