The Development Authority Implementation of Judicial Review by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v5i1.121Keywords:
Constitutional Court, Judicial Review, RegulationsAbstract
All typical products regulated the state could be reviewed and tested through legal actions (legal remedies) facilitated by the constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. This mechanism has known as a review action. In addition, the review on the legislation, related to authorization or the right to review it (toetsingsrecht or the right to review) could be consisted of judges and executives and also the legislatives. The authority of judicial review by the constitutional court is a judicial authority of the constitution. The authorization was a result of the third amendment to the Indonesian constitution of 1945. Regarding the developments of the implementation of the judicial authority by the constitutional court, there were increasing trend of judicial reviews year to year. Thus it indicates the number of regulations have problematic issue in term of of quality. Therefore, it is very urgent to critically evaluate the quality of the formulation of laws in order to avoid the cancellation of the law itself through a judicial authority possessed through the constitutional court.
References
Abdul Latif, Fungsi Mahkamah Konstitusi, Upaya Mewujudkan Negara Hukum Demokrasi, Yogyakarta: Total Media, 2009.
Alviandri. (2007). Judicial Review dalam Ketatanegaraan Indonesia, Program Pascasarjana Ilmu Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah, Surakarta.
Amrullah, A. (2014). Paradigma Saksi Mahkota dalam Persidangan Pidana di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 2(2), 83-104.
Asshiddiqie, Jimly. (2003). “Struktur Ketatanegaraan Indonesia Setelah Perubahan Keempat UUD Tahun 1945”, Makalah dalam Seminar Pembangunan Hukum Nasional VIII yang diselenggarakan oleh Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, Departemen Kehakiman dan HAM RI, Denpasar, 14-18 Juli 2003.
Asshiddiqie, Jimly. (2007). Pokok-Pokok Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia Pasca Reformasi, Jakarta: Bhuana Ilmu Populer, 2007.
Fadjar, Abdul Mukthie (2006)., Hukum Konstitusi dan Mahkamah Konstitusi, Jakarta: Konstitusi Press dan Citra Media, Yogyakarta.
Fuady, Munir. (2009). Teori Negara Hukum Modern, Rechtstaat, Jakarta: Refika Aditama.
Gustavo Femandes de Andrade (2001). “Comparative Constitutional Law: Judicial Review, Journal of Constitutional Law, Vol. 3:3, May 2001.
Kelsen, Hans (1973), General Theory Of Law, Translated by Andrew Wedberg, Russel&Russel, New York, sebagaimana dikutip Elviandri dari Sumali, Reduksi Kekusaan Eksekutif Di Bidang Peraturan Pengganti Undang-Undang (PERPU), Malang: UMM Press, 2002.
Lvina, E. (2015). The Role of Cross-Cultural Communication Competence: Effective Transformational Leadership Across Cultures. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 3(1), 1-18.
Mahkamah Konstitusi. (2016). Sejarah dan Pembentukan, Kedudukan serta Kewenangan MahkamahKonstitusi,http://www.mahkamahkonstitusi.go.id/index.php?page=web.Berita&id=11768#.WDLPS9KLTIU, diakses pada 20 November 2016.
Morgan, J. H. (2014). Americanizing Islam as the Price of Assimilation. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 2(2), 1-16.
Safa’at, Muchamad Ali, dkk. (2010). Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi, Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi.
Simamora, Janpatar. (2006). “Considering Centralization Of Judicial Review Authority In Indonesia Constitutional System”, IOSR Journal of Humanities And Social Science (IOSR-JHSS), Shastri Nagar, Ghaziabad: International Organization of Scientific Research, Vol. 21, Issue 2, Ver. V Feb. 2016.
Simamora, Janpatar. (2013a). Problem Yuridis Keberadaan TAP MPR dalam Hierarki Peraturan Perundang-undangan Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011, Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, vol. 10 No. 3 September 2013, Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Peraturan Perundang-undangan Kementerian Hukum dan HAM RI.
Simamora, Janpatar. (2013b). “Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Model Kewenangan Judicial Review di Indonesia”, Jurnal Mimbar Hukum, Vol. 25 No. 3 Oktober 2013, Yogyakarta: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada.
Tabrani. ZA. (2014). Islamic Studies dalam Pendekatan Multidisipliner (Suatu Kajian Gradual Menuju Paradigma Global). Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 2(2), 127-144.
Tabrani. ZA. (2016). Perubahan Ideologi Keislaman Turki (Analisis Geo-Kultur Islam dan Politik Pada Kerajaan Turki Usmani). Jurnal Edukasi: Jurnal Bimbingan Konseling, 2(2), 130-146.
Wardron, Jeremy, (2016) “The Core of the Case Against Judicial Review”, The Yale Law Journal, Vol. 115, 2006.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Haposan Siallagan (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: (1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC-BY-SA) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal; (2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal; (3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website), as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
