SOCIAL CAPITAL AND POLITENESS STRATEGIES IN FOSTERING ETHNIC RELATIONS IN MALAYSIA AND PHILIPPINES

Authors

  • Francisco Perlas Dumanig Faculty of Language & Linguistics University of Malaya, Malaysia Author

Keywords:

Social Capital, Politeness Strategies, Fostering Ethnic, Relations

Abstract

Social capital helps in developing relationships among people in a community or from one community to the other. The concept of social capital focuses on social relationships or individual relationship which is an important tool in building a united and progressive society. It goes without saying that in a multi-ethnic and multilingual society, social capital is necessary to help foster unity and harmony among various ethnic groups. However, such socialization and sharing of knowledge can be obstructed in multi-ethnic societies by social barriers in the form of negative preconceptions towards other ethnic groups. Stereotyping is the result of distancing due to prejudice, which is usually the result of ignorance of the values and culture of other groups. The similarities of the cultural and social values among the Malays, Chinese and Indians for instance, the use of address terms, non-verbal signs and discourse norms in interaction as politeness strategies within their ethnic groups or across the major ethnic groups foster better and harmonious relationships. Similarly, in the Philippines different ethnic groups from the various regions of the country are able to share the same culture and values when interacting with one another.

References

Barth, F. 1969. Ethnic groups and boundaries. Long Grove, Ill: Waveland Press, Inc.
Bourdieu, P. 1977. “Cultural Reproduction and social reproduction,” in Power and Ideology in Education, eds. Jerome Karabel and A. H. Halsey. New York: Oxford University Press.
Brown, P. & Levinson, S. 1987. Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Chan, H. C. 2004. Racial polarisation and room-mate choices among university students. In Cheah Boon Kheng. The challenge of ethnicity: Building a nation in Malaysia. Singapore: Marshall Cavendish International.
Coleman, J. C. 1988. Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital. American Journal of Sociology 94: S95-S120.
Dumanig, Francisco. 2007, July. Analysis on the language choice and marital typology of South-East Asian couples. Paper presented at the 2nd Singapore Graduate Forum on Southeast Asian Studies. Singapore.
Fatimah Daud. 1984. Some patterns of ethnic relations in Malaysia. Asian Profile, 13 (2).
Ide, S. 1992. On the Notion of wakimae: Toward an integrated framework of linguistic politeness. In Kotoba no mozaiku. Okuda Natsuko Meiyo Kyōju Koki Kinen Ronbunshu. Tokyo: Mejiro Linguistic Society.
Mills, S. 2003. Gender and politeness. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
National Statistics. 2008. Philippine Population. Retrieved June 7, 2008 from http://www.census.gov.ph/data/pressrelease/2008/pr0830tx.html
Ponmalar N. A., M.K. David & Sri Kumar Ramayan. 2009. Representation of a minority Community in a Malaysian Tamil daily. Language in India. 9:3. http://www.languageinindia.com/jan2009/mayanotionalismalaysia.html
Putnam, R. D. 1993. Making Democracy Work. Civic traditions in modern Italy, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Published

2014-09-25

How to Cite

Dumanig, F. P. (2014). SOCIAL CAPITAL AND POLITENESS STRATEGIES IN FOSTERING ETHNIC RELATIONS IN MALAYSIA AND PHILIPPINES. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 2(3), 23-38. https://journal.scadindependent.org/index.php/jipeuradeun/article/view/37