Why Was “Self-Government” Not Achieved in Aceh? The Challenges of Implementing a Peace Agreement
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v10i3.789Keywords:
Peace Agreement, Self-Government, Helsinki MoU, AcehAbstract
The "self-government" was proposed as an alternative solution to independence and special autonomy to end the protracted conflict in Aceh. Based on the contents of the peace agreement signed in 2005, Aceh is given the right to self-government. However, this is not realized fully. This study aimed to explain the imagined self-government and the causes challenging it to be implemented. The study used a qualitative library research method in which data was sourced from online text documents. The data were analyzed using critical discourse analysis. The study found that the issue of "self-government" was initially at the center of the negotiation. The Free Aceh Movement - GAM envisioned it like Olan Island in Finland and Sarawak in Malaysia. Still, it has not been realized because it was not declared explicitly in the agreement, and the term "self-government" was used as a strategy to persuade GAM negotiators to continue in the negotiation. Further, the Government of Indonesia (GoI) offered Aceh special autonomy instead of self-government through the Law on Governing Aceh by ignoring the limitations on the authority of GoI over Aceh that was agreed. This was caused by five reasons that lay in the negotiation process and the realization of the agreement interconnected. Amongst; GAM was unbalanced to GoI during the negotiations and powerless to force GoI to obey the deal, and there was no punishment mechanism for the violator of the agreement. Finally, the study revealed that an inclusive process in drafting new laws for a post-conflict region does not always result in full outcomes by the agreement.
References
Abdurahman, Ali, and Bilal Dewansyah. (2019). “Asymmetric Decentralization and Peace Building: A Comparison of Aceh dan Northern Ireland”. PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) 6(2).
Accord. (2008). Learning from the Indonesia-Aceh Peace Process. Conciliation Resources.
Ahtisaari, Martti. (2008). “Lessons of Aceh Peace Talks”. Asia Europe Journal 6(1):9–14.
Amin, S. M. (2020). Understanding the History of the Aceh Conflict. Springer.
Armia, Muhammad Siddiq. (2018). “Democracy Through Election: A Study on the Conflict of Norms in Aceh’s Election Process”. JSEAHR 2:323.
Askandar, K. (2005). The Aceh Conflict and the Roles of the Civil Society: Kertas Bentangan Pada “Workshop on the Roles of Civil Society in Peace Building in Southeast Asia". Sweden.
Aspinall, Edward. (2005). “The Helsinki Agreement: A More Promising Basis for Peace in Aceh?”.
Barter, Shane Joshua, and Hipolitus Ringgi Wangge. (2022). “Indonesian Autonomies: Explaining Divergent Self-Government Outcomes in Aceh and Papua”. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 52(1):55–81.
Basri, Hasan. (2014). “Konflik Pemerintah Aceh Dan Pemerintah Pusat Pasca MoU Helsinki: Self-Government”. Politika 5(1).
Basri, Hasan, and A. K. Siti Nabiha. (2014). “Accountability of Local Government: The Case of Aceh Province, Indonesia”. Asia Pacific Journal of Accounting and Finance 3(1):1–14.
Blažević, Iva. (2021). “Nagorno-Karabakh: a Conflict Lasting for More than Three Decades”. Obnova, Časopis Za Kulturu, Društvo i Politiku 15(1):142–59.
Boonpunth, Kayanee Chor, and Niwadee Saheem. (2022). “Roles of Civil Society in Peace Building in Southeast Asia: The Case Studies of Mindanao, Aceh, and Southernmost Thailand”. Asian Affairs: An American Review 49(2):88–112.
Budiratna, Hasta, and Riatu M. Qibthiyyah. (2020). “Evaluasi Atas Transfer Dana Otonomi Khusus di Aceh, Papua, dan Papua Barat”. Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains 1(5):402–14.
Chiluwa, Innocent. (2019). Discourse Analysis and Conflict Studies. SAGE Publications Ltd.
Czarny, Roman S., Magdalena Tomala, and Iwona Wrońska. (2021). “Leading Players in the North American Arctic”. in Politics and Development in the North American Arctic. Emerald Publishing Limited.
Darmalaksana, Wahyudin. 2020. “Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Studi Pustaka dan Studi Lapangan”. Pre-Print Digital Library UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung.
DeRouen Jr, Karl, Mark J. Ferguson, Samuel Norton, Young Hwan Park, Jenna Lea, and Ashley Streat-Bartlett. (2010). “Civil War Peace Agreement Implementation and State Capacity”. Journal of Peace Research 47(3):333–46.
Djuli, M. Nur, and Nurdin Abdul Rahman. (2008). “The Helsinki Negotiations: A Perspective from Free Aceh Movement Negotiators’, Accord (Conciliation Resources)”.
Djumala, Darmansjah. (2013). Soft Power Untuk Aceh. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Dudouet, Véronique. (2021). From the Street to the Peace Table: Nonviolent Mobilization During Intrastate Peace Processes. JSTOR.
Emerson, Rupert. (1957). “The Approach to Self-Government”.
Fujikawa, Kentaro. (2021). “Settling with Autonomy after Civil Wars: Lessons from Aceh, Indonesia”. Global Policy. doi: 10.1111/1758-5899.12949.
Grayman, Jesse Hession. (2013). Humanitarian Encounters in Post-Conflict Aceh, Indonesia. Harvard University.
Hadiwinata, Bob S. (2010). “Transformasi Gerakan Aceh Merdeka.” Jakarta: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung.
Hillman, Ben. (2013). “Public Administration Reform in Post‐cConflict Societies: Lessons from Aceh, Indonesia”. Public Administration and Development 33(1):1–14.
Initiative, Crisis Management. (2005). “Memorandum of Understanding between the Government of the Republic of Indonesia and the Free Aceh Movement”. Official Memorandum. Helsinki, Finland: Crisis Management Initiative.
Initiative, Crisis Management. (2012). “Aceh Peace Process Follow-up Project: Final Report”. Helsinki, Finland, and Brussels, Belgium.
Jatmika, Sidik, Nanang Sumanang, Ajeng Puspa Marlinda, Chalilla Raihan Nabilazka, and Muhammad Indrawan Jatmika. (2022). “Why Aceh-Indonesia Conflict Resolution Can’t Be Copy-Paste in Bangsamoro-Philippines Issue?” Jurnal Hubungan Internasional 11(1).
Jemadu, Aleksuis. (2005). “Proses Peacebuilding Di Aceh: Dari MoU Helsinki Menuji Implementasi Undang-Undang Tentang Pemerintagan Aceh”. Indonesian J. Int’l L. 3:527.
Kadir, Aiyub, and M. Ya’kub. (2018). “Peace Agreement between the Government of Indonesia and the Free Aceh Movement: Its Natures and Challenges”. Indon. L. Rev. 8:168.
Kadir, M. Y. Aiyub. (2012). “Negotiating Aceh Self-Determination in Indonesia’s Unitary System: A Study on Peace Agreement Helsinki Memorandum of Understanding 2005”. Aceh International Journal of Social Science 1(2).
Kadir, M. Ya’kub Aiyub. (2019). “Policy and Practice: Refleksi Perjanjian Damai Helsinki 2005-2018: Kesuksesan dan Tantangan Ke Depan”. Journal of Humanity and Social Justice 1(1):33–51.
Latif, Ikhwan Rahmatika, Dyah Mutiarin, and Achmad Nurmandi. (2020). “The Quality of Peace in Post-Conflict Situation: A Comparative Study Between Armed Conflicts in Aceh and Bangsamoro”. Global: Jurnal Politik Internasional 22(2):221–43.
Lee, Terence. (2020). “Political Orders and Peace-Building: Ending the Aceh Conflict.” Conflict, Security & Development 20(1):115–39.
Lele, Gabriel. (2021). “Asymmetric Decentralization, Accommodation, and Separatist Conflict: Lessons from Aceh and Papua, Indonesia”. Territory, Politics, Governance 1–19.
Matsyah, Ajidar, and Umar bin Abdul Aziz. (2021). “Pasang Surut Hubungan Aceh-Jakarta Pasca MoU Helsinki”. Jurnal Adabiya 23(2):255–83.
May, Bernhard. (2008). “The Law on the Governing of Aceh: The Way Forward or a Source of Conflicts”. Accord: An International Review of Peace Initiatives 20–42.
Miller, Michelle Ann. (2012). “Self-Governance as a Framework for Conflict Resolution in Aceh”. Autonomy and Armed Separatism in South and Southeast Asia 36–58.
Murziqin, R., Tabrani ZA, & Zulfadli. (2012). Performative Strength in the Hierarchy of Power and Justice. Journal of Islamic Law and Culture, 10(2), 123–144.
Murziqin, R., & Tabrani ZA. (2016). The Importance of Local Parties and Incumbency to the Electoral in Aceh. Journal of Islamic Law and Culture, 10(2), 123–144.
Neudorfer, Natascha S., Ulrike G. Theuerkauf, and Stefan Wolff. (2022). “Territorial Self-Governance and Proportional Representation: Reducing the Risk of Territory-Centred Intrastate Violence”. Territory, Politics, Governance 10(4):504–26.
Ocktaviana, Sentiela, and Suraiya Kamaruzzaman. (2021). “Examining Women, Peace, and Security Agenda in Local Concept Case Study: Aceh, Indonesia”. Jurnal Masyarakat Dan Budaya 23(2).
OECD. (2018). Aceh Public Expenditure Analysis: Spending for Reconstruction and Poverty Reduction.
Oktaviani, Jusmalia, and Teguh Puja Pramadya. (2017). “Peran Crisis Management Intitiative (CMI) Melalui Proyek Tindak Lanjut Proses Perdamaian Aceh Dalam Proses Bina Damai Di Aceh (2009-2012)”. Pandecta Research Law Journal 12(1):76–87.
Ronnie, D. (2016). Ripe for Rivalry or Ready for Peace: Understanding the Reasons for the Success and Failure of the Peace Process in Aceh. University of Helsinki.
Ross, M. L. (2005). Resources and Rebellion in Aceh, Indonesia. Washington DC: World Bank.
Sahlan, Muhammad, Suci Fajarni, Siti Ikramatoun, Ade Ikhsan Kamil, and Iromi Ilham. (2019). “The Roles of Ulama in the Process of Post-Conflict Reconciliation in Aceh”. Society 7(2):251–67.
Sahruddin. (2014). “Aceh Party in the Transition of Democracy in Aceh”. Jurnal Politik 10(01).
Sanusi, S., Azwardi, A., Yusuf, R., & Iqbal, M. (2018). The Attitude of the Language of Ex-Combatans and the Victims of Armed Conflict of Aceh Post-MoU Helsinki. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 6(3), 493-506. https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v6i3.258
Saputra, Akmal, Heru Nugroho, and Arie Sujito. 2022. “Post-Conflict Aceh; Partai Aceh Versus Partai Nanggroe Aceh at the 2017 Election”. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun 10(1):87–104.
Schulte, Felix. (2018). “Ethnic Conflict Regulation Through Territorial Autonomy–A Configurational Analysis of Success and Failure”.
Schulze-Schneider, and Ingrid. (2012). “From Dictatorship to Democracy. In The Globalization of News”.
SD, Hardi Alunaza. (2021). “The Role of the Third Party in Resolving the Conflict in Aceh”. Journal of International Relations (JoS) 1(001):64–69.
Simolin, Susann. (2020). The Åland Example in Use 1990-2019: Where, When, How, Why and by Whom? Åland Islands Peace Institute.
Sindre, Gyda M., and Nicholas Ross. (2021). Case Study of the Aceh Peace Process: Inclusion, Participation, and Representation.
Soloninka, Deanna. (2019). Territorial Self-Government as a Conflict Management Tool:(Federalism and Internal Conflicts Series). edited by Dawn Walsh. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Stange, G., and A. Missbach. (2018). “The Aceh Peace Process: Wheeling and Dealing behind Closed Doors. Aspirations with Limitations: Indonesia’s Foreign Affairs under Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono”. 231.
Sukma, Rizal. (2005). “Ethnic Conflicts in Indonesia: Causes and the Quest for Solution”. Ethnic Conflicts in Southeast Asia 1–4.
Suksi, M. (2013). Territorial Autonomy: The Åland Islands in Comparison with Other Substate Entities. Autonomies in Europe: Solutions and Challenges.
Tando, C., Sudarmo, S., & Haryanti, R. (2021). Conflict Resolution in the Performance of Collaborative Governance: A Systematic Literature Review. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 9(1), 161-178. https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v9i1.486
Tengah, S. (2007). Mengawal Demokrasi: Pengalaman Jaringan Demokrasi Aceh dan RUUPA. Yappika.
Varga, Ádám. (2021). “Local Self-Governments and the Vertical Division of Power”. Pub. Governance, Admin. & Fin. L. Rev. 6:121.
Walsh, Dawn, and Finotello. (2018). Territorial Self-Government as a Conflict Management Tool. Springer.
Yani, Y. P. (2018). “Proses Penyelesaian Konflik Aceh Melalui MoU Helsinki: Keberhasilan Pemerintah Indonesia Membuat GAM Menerima Konsep Self Government. Doctoral Dissertation”. Universitas Gadjah Mada.
Zainal, S. (2015). “Nota Kesepahaman Helsinki untuk Mengakhiri Konflik Aceh: Telaah Sosiologi Politik dan Histori”. Konfrontasi: Jurnal Kultural, Ekonomi Dan Perubahan Sosial 2(1):5–19.
Zainal, S. (2016). “Transformasi Konflik Aceh dan Relasi Sosial-Politik di Era Desentralisasi”. MASYARAKAT: Jurnal Sosiologi 81–109.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Suadi Zainal, Kamarulzaman Askandar, Muhammad bin Abubakar (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: (1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC-BY-SA) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal; (2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal; (3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website), as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
