The Semiotic Meaning and Philosophy of Symbols in the Gayo Ethnic Marriage Processions in Central Aceh
Abstract
This research critically studied the verbal and nonverbal symbols in the processions of the marriage tradition of the Gayo ethnic in Central Aceh by tracing back, exploring and examining all symbols and their symbolic meanings and philosophy as an effort of preserving one of the Gayo traditional heritages. Its main aim was to describe unique verbal and non-verbal symbolic features with semiotic meanings and philosophical messages based on the local values of the Gayo ethnic. The study employed a qualitative research design. The data were collected from observation, interviews and documentation. The data were analyzed with the Miles and Huberman interactive models consisting of data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing/ verification. Meanwhile result analysis was based on the semiotic analysis of Roland Barthes. The result showed that most of the series of phases of Gayo ethnic marriage processions were filled with verbal and non-verbal symbols, which have semiotic meanings and philosophical messages which are still used until this day. However, many of those verbal and nonverbal symbols have no longer been understood well by Gayo young generation. Consequently, they only perform the series of processions as a formality without understanding the meaning of each symbol.
References
Auni, L. Manan, A. & Abubakar, A. (2022). Factors Changing the Gayo Ethnic's Traditional Marriage Procession in Lut Tawar Sub-District of Takengon, Central Aceh, Indonesia, 6(2), 703-733. https:// doi.org:10.22373/sjhk.v6i2.14888
Bakti, I. S., Nirzalin, & Abidin. (2020). Reification of the signified and consumerization of wedding receptions “sintê mungêrjê” in the Gayo Lôt Society in Central Aceh District. Sodality: Jurnal Sosiologi Pedesaan, 8(2), 15–35. https://doi.org/10.22500/8202030444
Bowen, J. R. (1991). Sumatran Politics and Poetics: Gayo History, 1900-1989. Yale University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt2250wwf
Buniyamin, S. (2004). Budaya dan adat istiadat Gayo Lues. Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Felicia, A.O. (2016). English-French Translation of Igbo Traditional Marriage Items: A Semiotic Approach. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 7(1), 311-316. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2016.v7n1s1p311
Geertz, C. (2013). Anthropological approaches to the study of religion. In M. Banton (Ed.), Religion as a cultural system (pp. 87–125). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315017579
Hancock, B., Ockleford, E., & Windridge, K. (2001). An introduction to qualitative research. Trent Focus Group.
Ibrahim, M. (2001). Mujahid Dataran Tinggi Gayo. Yayasan Maqamamahmuda.
Ibrahim, M., & Hakim. (2002). Syariat dan adat istiadat. Yayasan Maqammahmuda.
Jazeri, M. & Susanto. (2020). Semiotics of Roland Barthes in Symbols Systems of Javanese Wedding Ceremony. International LinguisticsResearch, 3(2), 22-31. https://doi.org/10.30560/ilr.v3n2p22
Manan, A. (2014). The ritual of marriage: An ethnographic study in West Labuhan Haji-South Aceh. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 2(2), 17–44.
Manan, A. (2015). The Ritual Calendar of South Aceh, Indonesia [Wissenschaftliche Schriften der WWU Münster]. https://repository.ar-raniry.ac.id/id/eprint/3104
Manan, A. (2017). The Ritual Calendar of South Aceh, Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 5(1), 59–75. https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v5i1.120
Manan, A. (2020). Islamic Educational Values in Life-Cycle Rituals: An Ethnographic Study in Kluet Timur Community, Aceh, Indonesia. In M. Huda, J. Safar, A. K. Mohamed, K. A. Jasmi, & B. Basiron (Eds.), Global Perspectives on Teaching and Learning Paths in Islamic Education (pp. 118–134). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-8528-2
Manan, A., Kamarullah, Putra, R. S., Saprizal, Salasiyah, C. I., & Fadhilah, M. A. (2021). Tulak Bala as an Outbreak Prevention Within Sharia-based Community. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Science, Technology, and Modern Society (ICSTMS 2020), 145–150. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210909.034
Marhamah. (2017). Verbal symbols of Islamic communication ethic at Gayo ethnic in Central Aceh, Indonesia. Journal of Humanities and Social Science (IOSR-JHSS), 22(11), 20–32. https://doi.org/10.9790/0837-2211032032
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). An expanded source book: Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Nurdin, R., Yusuf, M., & Natasya, S. S. (2021). The Gayonese culture of marriage system: The Islamic Law perspective. Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam, 5(1), 108–126. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v5i1.9257
Pandapotan, S. (2017). Proses peminangan menurut adat istiadat Gayo di Desa Kala Lengkio Kecamatan Kebayakan Kabupaten Aceh Tengah. JUPIIS: Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, 9(1), 72–83. https://doi.org/10.24114/jupiis.v9i1.6462
Passandaran, Y.S. (2019). The Semiotic Representation Analysis of Wedding Ceremony in West Sumatera Province. Human Narratives Journal, 1(1), 45-54. https://doi.org/10.30998/hn.v1i1.24
Ruhmi, Z., Zubainur, C. M., & Yusrizal, Y. (2019). Development of Gayo culture based learning device with realistic approach. International Journal of Trends in Mathematics Education Research, 2(2), 64–67. https://doi.org/10.33122/ijtmer.v2i2.43
Selian, R. S. (2018). Pendekatan semiotik upacara adat pernikahan etnik Gayo: Kajian estetika tradisional masyarakat etnik Gayo (Ismawan (ed.)). Bandar Publishing.
Siregar, I. (2022). Semiotics Analysis in The Betawi Traditional Wedding "Palang Pintu": The Study of Semiotics Roland Barthes. International Journal of Linguistics Studies, 2(1): 01-07. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijls.2022.2.1.1
Suyadi & Sabiq, A.F. (2020). Acculturation of islamic culture as a symbol of siraman rituals in java traditional wedding. NJECT (Interdisciplinary Journal of Communication) 5(2), pp. 221-244. https://doi.org/ 10.18326/INJECT.V5I2.221-244
Turner, V. W. (1979). The ritual process: Structure and anti-structure. Aldine Publishing Company.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: (1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC-BY-SA) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal; (2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal; (3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
