Digital Government in Social Sciences Discipline: Mapping Pivotal Features and Proposed Theoretical Model

  • Siti Hasanah Department of Law Master, Universitas Muhammadiyah Mataram, Indonesia
  • Inka Nusamuda Pratama Universitas Muhammadiyah Mataram, Indonesia
  • Al Fauzi Rahmat Master of Government Affairs and Administration, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Cahyadi Kurniawan Universitas Muhammadiyah Mataram, Indonesia

Abstract

The research aimed to describe the trend issues, identify the key features, and propose a theoretical model of digital government. A comprehensive search was used to find eligible articles in the Academic Scopus Database. Further, the quality of the study was assessed during the screening phase, where it met 115 journal-related articles on digital government within the social sciences discipline. Further, this literature was analyzed by NVivo 12 Plus via a hierarchy diagram, cluster analysis, word frequency analysis, and the VOSViwer tool to visualize the data via a network, overlay, and density analysis. The findings revealed a term network formed by digital government and trend issues, resulting in several growing concerns, such as e-government, open government, and technology adoption. Furthermore, key features were reported following proportional analysis, such as systems, development, services, models, information, public, policy, management, and networks. Another point is that a proposed theoretical model has been constructed and selected for future research.

References

Abusleme, C. (2020). Cracking the Political Code: The Case of e-Participation in Colombia. EJournal of EDemocracy and Open Government, 12(2), 192–215. https://doi.org/10.29379/jedem.v12i2.605
Alvarenga, A., Matos, F., Godina, R., & Matias, J. C. O. (2020). Digital Transformation and Knowledge Management in the Public Sector. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(14). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145824
Bajaj, A., & Ram, S. (2007). A Comprehensive Framework Towards Information Sharing Between Government Agencies. International Journal of Electronic Government Research (IJEGR), 3(2), 29–44. https://doi.org/10.4018/jegr.2007040102
Bright, J., Lee, S., Margetts, H., Wang, N., & Hale, S. (2019). Explaining Download Patterns in Open Government Data: Citizen Participation or Private Enterprise? International Journal of Electronic Governance, 11(2), 217–234. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEG.2019.101499
Brown, A., Fishenden, J., Thompson, M., & Venters, W. (2017). Appraising the Impact and Role of Platform Models and Government as a Platform (GaaP) in U.K. Government Public Service Reform: Towards a Platform Assessment Framework (PAF). Government Information Quarterly, 34(2), 167–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.03.003
Chen, S.-C., Chen, M., Zhao, N., Hamid, S., Chatterjee, K., & Armella, M. (2009). Florida Public Hurricane Loss Model: Research in Multi-Disciplinary System Integration Assisting Government Policymaking. Government Information Quarterly, 26(2), 285–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2008.12.004
Daniel, C., & Pettit, C. (2021). Digital Disruption and Planning–Use of Data and Digital Technology by Professional Planners and Perceptions of Change to Planning Work. Australian Planner, 57(1), 50–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/07293682.2021.1920995
Dawes, S. S. (2009). Governance in the Digital Age: A Research and Action Framework for an Uncertain Future. Government Information Quarterly, 26(2), 257–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2008.12.003
De Blasio, E., & Selva, D. (2019). Implementing Open Government: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Digital Platforms in France, Italy and United Kingdom. Quality and Quantity, 53(2), 871–896. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-018-0793-7
Duruji, M. M., Olanrewaju, F. O., Olu-Owolabi, F. E., Duruji-Moses, F. U., & Chukwudi, C. (2021). Digital Government in the Electoral Process: Implications for Elections in Nigeria. African Renaissance, 18(2), 251–274. https://doi.org/10.31920/2516-5305/2021/18n2a12
Erkut, B. (2020). From Digital Government to Digital Governance: Are we there yet? Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12030860
Eynon, R., & Dutton, W. H. (2007). Barriers to Networked Governments: Evidence from Europe. Prometheus (United Kingdom), 25(3), 225–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/08109020701531361
Eyob, E. (2004). E-government: Breaking the Frontiers of Inefficiencies in the Public Sector. Electronic Government, 1(1), 107–114. https://doi.org/10.1504/EG.2004.004140
Freund, L., Jinglewski, M., & Kessler, K. (2012). Introducing FRED: Faceted Retrieval of e-government documents. Proceedings of the ASIST Annual Meeting, 49(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.14504901310
Gil-Garcia, J. R., Guler, A., Pardo, T. A., & Burke, G. B. (2019). Characterizing the Importance of Clarity of Roles and Responsibilities in Government Inter-Organizational Collaboration and Information-Sharing Initiatives. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.101393
Gil-Garcia, J. R., Pardo, T. A., & Nam, T. (2015). What Makes a City Smart? Identifying core Components and Proposing an Integrative and Comprehensive Conceptualization. Information Polity, 20(1), 61–87. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-150354
Gil-Garcia, J. R., &Sayogo, D. S. (2016). Government inter-Organizational Information Sharing Initiatives: Understanding the main Determinants of Success. Government Information Quarterly, 33(3), 572–582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.01.006
Helbig, N., Gil-García, J. R., & Ferro, E. (2009). Understanding the Complexity of Electronic Government: Implications from the Digital Divide Literature. Government Information Quarterly, 26(1), 89–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2008.05.004
Henman, P. (2019). Of Algorithms, Apps and Advice: Digital Social Policy and Service Delivery. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 12(1), 71–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/17516234.2018.1495885
Henman, P. (2020). Improving Public Services using Artificial Intelligence: Possibilities, Pitfalls, Governance. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 42(4), 209–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/23276665.2020.1816188
Janowski, T., Estevez, E., & Baguma, R. (2018). Platform Governance for Sustainable Development: Reshaping Citizen-Administration Relationships in the Digital Age. Government Information Quarterly, 35(4), S1–S16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.09.002
Janssen, M., Chun, S. A., & Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2009). Building the Next Generation of Digital Government Infrastructures. Government Information Quarterly, 26(2), 233–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2008.12.006
Karippur, N. K., Liang, S., & Balaramachandran, P. R. (2020). Factors Influencing the Adoption Intention of Artificial Intelligence for Public Engagement in Singapore. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 16(4), 73–93. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEGR.2020100105
Katsonis, M., & Botros, A. (2015). Digital Government: A Primer and Professional Perspectives. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 74(1), 42–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12144
Kavanaugh, A. L., Fox, E. A., Sheetz, S. D., Yang, S., Li, L. T., Shoemaker, D. J., … Xie, L. (2012). Social Media use by the Government: From the Routine to the Critical. Government Information Quarterly, 29(4), 480–491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.06.002
Kotsev, A., Minghini, M., Tomas, R., Cell, V., & Lutz, M. (2020). From Spatial Data Infrastructures to Data Spaces—A Technological Perspective on the Evolution of European SDIs. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi9030176
Lee, J. (2010). 10-Year retrospect on Stage Models of e-Government: A Qualitative Meta-Synthesis. Government Information Quarterly, 27(3), 220–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2009.12.009
Lee, T. D., Park, H., & Lee, J. (2019). Collaborative Accountability for Sustainable Public Health: A Korean Perspective on the Effective use of ICT-Based Health Risk Communication. Government Information Quarterly, 36(2), 226–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.12.008
Luna-Reyes, L. F., & Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2014). Digital Government Transformation and Internet Portals: The Co-Evolution of Technology, Organizations, and Institutions. Government Information Quarterly, 31(4), 545–555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2014.08.001
Luna, D. E., Gil-Garcia, J. R., Luna-Reyes, L. F., Sandoval-Almazan, R., & Duarte-Valle, A. (2013). Improving the Performance Assessment of Government Web Portals: A Proposal using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). Information Polity, 18(2), 169–187. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-130302
Marienfeldt, J. (2021). Three Paths To E-Service Availability: a Fuzzy set Qualitative Comparative Analysis Among the E.U. Member States. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 34(7), 783–798. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-12-2020-0325
Matheus, R., & Janssen, M. (2020). A Systematic Literature Study to Unravel Transparency Enabled by Open Government Data: The Window Theory. Public Performance and Management Review, 43(3), 503–534. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2019.1691025
Melitski, J., Holzer, M., Kim, S.-T., Kim, C.-G., & Rho, S.-Y. (2005). Digital Government Worldwide: A e-Government Assessment of Municipal Web Sites. International Journal of Electronic Government Research (IJEGR), 1(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.4018/jegr.2005010101
Mergel, I., Edelmann, N., & Haug, N. (2019). Defining Digital Transformation: Results from Expert Interviews. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.002
Nicholls, T. (2019). Local Government Performance, Cost-Effectiveness, and Use of the Web: An Empirical Analysis. Policy and Internet, 11(4), 480–507. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.209
Ning, X., Ramirez, R., & Khuntia, J. (2021). Blockchain-Enabled Government Efficiency and Impartiality: Using Blockchain for Targeted Poverty Alleviation in a city in China. Information Technology for Development, 27(3), 599–616. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2021.1925619
Norris, D. F. (2005). Electronic Democracy at the American Grassroots. International Journal of Electronic Government Research (IJEGR), 1(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.4018/jegr.2005070101
Rawat, P. (2020). A Systematic Review of Multiple Terminologies for ICT in Government: A Mesh of Concentric and Overlapping Circles. Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society, 40(1–2), pp. 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467620980996
Robertson, S. P., Douglas, S., Maruyama, M., & Semaan, B. (2013). Political Discourse on Social Networking Sites: Sentiment, In-Group/Out-Group Orientation and Rationality. Information Polity, 18(2), 107–126. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-130303
Robertson, S. P., Vatrapu, R. K., & Medina, R. (2010). Off the wall Political Discourse: Facebook Use in the 2008 U.S. Presidential Election. Information Polity, 15(1–2), pp. 11–31. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-2010-0196
Sabucedo, L. A., & Rifón, L. A. (2010). Managing Citizen Profiles in the Domain of e-Government: The Portfolio Project. Information Systems Management, 27(4), 309–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2010.514181
Sánchez-Torres, J. M., & Miles, I. (2017). The Role of Future-Oriented Technology Analysis in e-Government: A Systematic Review. European Journal of Futures Research, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40309-017-0131-7
Scholl, H. J. (2020). Digital Government. Digital Government: Research and Practice, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1145/3352682
Seifert, J. W., & Relyea, H. C. (2004). Considering e-Government from the U.S. Federal Perspective: An Evolving Concept, a Developing Practice. Journal of E-Government, 1(1), 7–15. https://doi.org/10.1300/J399v01n01_02
Sharma, S. K., & Gupta, J. N. D. (2004). Web Services Architecture for m-Government: Issues and Challenges. Electronic Government, 1(4), 462–474. https://doi.org/10.1504/EG.2004.005921
Stone, M., Knapper, J., Evans, G., & Aravopoulou, E. (2018). Information Management in the Smart City. Bottom Line, 31(3–4), pp. 234–249. https://doi.org/10.1108/BL-07-2018-0033
Su, S., Fortes, J., Kasad, T. R., Patil, M., Matsunaga, A., Tsugawa, M., … Herrera, M. (2005). Transnational Information Sharing, Event Notification, Rule Enforcement and Process Coordination. International Journal of Electronic Government Research (IJEGR), 1(2), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.4018/jegr.2005040101
Susha, I., Pardo, T. A., Janssen, M., Adler, N., Verhulst, S. G., & Harbour, T. (2018). A Research Roadmap to Advance Data Collaboratives Practice as a Novel Research Direction. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 14(3), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEGR.2018070101
Tangi, L., Janssen, M., Benedetti, M., & Noci, G. (2021). Digital Government Transformation: A Structural Equation Modelling Analysis of Driving and Impeding Factors. International Journal of Information Management, 60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102356
Valle-Cruz, D., Sandoval-Almazan, R., & Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2016). Citizens’ Perceptions of the Impact of Information Technology Use on Transparency, Efficiency and Corruption in Local Governments. Information Polity, 21(3), 321–334. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-160393
Wang, C., Medaglia, R., & Zheng, L. (2018). Towards a Typology of Adaptive Governance in the Digital Government Context: The Role of Decision-Making and Accountability. Government Information Quarterly, 35(2), 306–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.08.003
Wang, H., Xiong, W., Wu, G., & Zhu, D. (2018). Public–Private Partnership in Public Administration Discipline: A Literature Review. Public Management Review, 20(2), 293–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1313445
Weerakkody, V., Omar, A., El-Haddadeh, R., & Al-Busaidy, M. (2016). Digitally-Enabled Service Transformation in the Public Sector: The Lure of Institutional Pressure and Strategic Response Towards Change. Government Information Quarterly, 33(4), 658–668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.06.006
Yavuz, N. (2022). Gender Differences in Perception and Usage of Public Transit Technologies: Implications for Digital Government. Information Polity, 27(1), 97–113. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-200305
Zuiderwijk, A., Chen, Y.-C., & Salem, F. (2021). Implications of the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Public Governance: A Systematic Literature Review and a Research Agenda. Government Information Quarterly, 38(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101577
Published
2023-01-30
How to Cite
HASANAH, Siti et al. Digital Government in Social Sciences Discipline: Mapping Pivotal Features and Proposed Theoretical Model. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, [S.l.], v. 11, n. 1, p. 195-220, jan. 2023. ISSN 2443-2067. Available at: <https://journal.scadindependent.org/index.php/jipeuradeun/article/view/819>. Date accessed: 18 june 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v11i1.819.