A Critical Network Governance Issues in Social Sciences Discipline: A Literature Review

  • Tukijan Tukijan Department of Public Administration, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Amal Ilmiah Yapis Wamena. Indonesia
  • Al Fauzi Rahmat Doctoral School of Economic and Regional Sciences, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences (MATE), Gödöllő, Hungary
  • Dafrin Muksin Department of Government Science, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Amal Ilmiah Yapis Wamena, Indonesia
  • Sahrul Pora Department of Government Science, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Muhammadiyah Maluku Utara, Indonesia
  • Muhammad Ade Putra Departement of Cultural Anthropology, Faculty of Cultural Sciences, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia

Abstract

Some scholars have underlined network governance issues in theoretical, conceptual, operational, and practical terms. However, it is still requested to core map this issue, as past scholars have lacked attention. Therefore, this paper explores network governance’s pivotal issues and proposes a theoretical model. A systematic literature review was conducted using Scopus database sources, and NVivo 12 Plus software was used as an assistive qualitative data analysis tool. This study revealed several viewpoints. First, network governance has received much attention over the last decade. Second, some essential core key terms are linked to network governance issues, such as social, public, government, policy, actor, political, institutional, and organizational. In addition, we proposed a theoretical model that can be used as a recommendation for future studies.

References

Alidar, E., Maulana, M. A., Syah, Y., & Usman, B. (2023). Juridical provisions on government policies towards marginal economic actors in Indonesia in the perspective of Islamic Law. Samarah : Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam, 7(1), 101. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v7i1.14621
Alvarado, R. E., & Bornstein, L. M. (2018). Assessing the Effectiveness of Water and Sanitation Sector Governance Networks in Developing Countries: A Policy Analysis Framework. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 13(3), 382–393. https://doi.org/10.2495/SDP-V13-N3-382-393.
Auriacombe, C., & Meyer, N. (2020). Realising South Africa’s National Development Plan Goals: The Need for Change to a Collaborative Democracy to Facilitate Community Participation. Central European Journal of Public Policy, 14(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.2478/cejpp-2020-0004.
Bailey, D., & Wood, M. (2017). The Metagovernance of English Devolution. Local Government Studies, 43(6), 966–991. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2017.1359165.
Barandiaran, X., & Luna, A. (2018). Building the Future of Public Policy in the Basque Country: Etorkizuna Eraikiz, a Metagovernance Approach. Cogent Social Sciences, 4(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2018.1503072.
Bianculli, A. C., Jordana, J., & Juanatey, A. G. (2017). International Networks as Drivers of Agency Independence: The Case of the Spanish Nuclear Safety Council. Administration and Society, 49(9), 1246–1271. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399715581034.
Boersma, K., Ferguson, J., Groenewegen, P., & Wolbers, J. (2021). The Dynamics of Power in Disaster Response Networks. Risk, Hazards and Crisis in Public Policy, 12(4), 418–433. https://doi.org/10.1002/rhc3.12218.
Carter, P. (2019). Time Tactics: Project Managing Policy Implementation in a Network. Time and Society, 28(2), 721–742. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X16682517.
Chen, C. (2017). Science Mapping: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Journal of Data and Information Science, 2(2), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1515/jdis-2017-0006
Dabbicco, G., & Steccolini, I. (2020). Building Legitimacy for European Public Sector Accounting Standards (EPSAS): A Governance Perspective. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 33(2–3), 229–245. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-12-2018-0264.
Edwards-Jones, A. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis with NVIVO. Journal of Education for Teaching, 40(2), 193–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2013.866724.
Ferlie, E. (2018). Exploring 30 Years of UK Public Services Management Reform–the Case of Health Care. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 34(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-06-2017-0178.
Fowler, P.J., Wright, K., Marcal, K.E., Ballard, E., & Hovmand, P.S. (2019). Capability Traps Impeding Homeless Services: A Community-Based System Dynamics Evaluation. Journal of Social Service Research, 45(3), 348–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/01488376.2018.1480560.
Gil-Garcia, J.R., Pardo, T.A., & Nam, T. (2015). What Makes a City Smart? Identifying Core Components and Proposing an Integrative and Comprehensive Conceptualization. Information Polity, 20(1), 61–87. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-150354.
Goritz, A., Kolleck, N., & JÖrgens, H. (2019). Education for Sustainable Development and Climate Change Education: The Potential of Social Network Analysis Based on Twitter Data. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(19), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11195499.
Groutsis, D., van den Broek, D., & Harvey, W.S. (2015). Transformations in Network Governance: The Case of Migration Intermediaries. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 41(10), 1558–1576. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2014.1003803.
Gulson, K.N., & Sellar, S. (2019). Emerging Data Infrastructures and the New Topologies of Education Policy. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 37(2), 350–366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775818813144.
Handoyo, S. (2018). The Role of Public Governance in Environmental Sustainability. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 6(2), 161-178. https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v6i2.255.
Hasle, P., Jørgen Limborg, H., Grøn, S., & Refslund, B. (2017). Orchestration in Work Environment Policy Programs.Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies, 7(3), 43. https://doi.org/10.18291/njwls.v7i3.97092.
Hertting, N., & Vedung, E. (2012). Purposes and Criteria in Network Governance Evaluation: How far does Standard Evaluation Vocabulary Take us? Evaluation, 18(1), 27–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389011431021.
Hickey, G.M., Snyder, H.T., deVries, J.R., & Temby, O. (2021). On Inter-Organizational Trust, Control and Risk in Transboundary Fisheries Governance. Marine Policy, 134(September), 104772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2021.104772.
Hughes, A., Gleeson, D., Legge, D., & Lin, V. (2015). Governance and Policy Capacity in Health Development and Implementation in Australia. Policy and Society, 34(3–4), 229–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2015.11.001.
Jha, S.K., Gold, E.R., & Dubé, L. (2021). Modular Interorganizational Network Governance: A Conceptual Framework for Addressing Complex Social Problems. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(18), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810292.
Johansson, S., & Liljegren, A. (2019). Democratic Accountability in Strategic Coordination Bodies - An Investigation of Governance in Swedish Elder Care. International Journal of Integrated Care, 19(3), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.4207.
Kim, T. (2020). Revisiting the Governance Narrative: The Dynamics of Developing National Educational Assessment Policy in South Korea. Policy Futures in Education, 18(5), 574–596. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210319873767.
Kitchenham, B., & Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for Performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering. 2.
Lan, C. I. C., & Peng, L. P. (2018). E-participation, Rural Regime, and Network Governance: A Case of Balien River Conservation. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(11), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10113908.
Lang, R., & Mullins, D. (2020). Field Emergence in Civil Society: A Theoretical Framework and Its Application to Community-Led Housing Organisations in England. Voluntas, 31(1), 184–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-019-00138-z.
Lehmkuhl, D., & Siegrist, O. (2009). Conditioned Networking: Swiss-EU Relations in Transport. Swiss Political Science Review, 15(4), 603–627. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1662-6370.2009.tb00147.x.
Lehtonen, M. (2014). Evaluating megaprojects: From the ‘Iron Triangle’ to Network Mapping. Evaluation, 20(3), 278–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389014539868.
Lester, T. W., & Reckhow, S. (2013). Network Governance and Regional Equity: Shared Agendas or Problematic Partners? Planning Theory, 12(2), 115–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095212455189.
Lewis, J. M., Ricard, L. M., & Klijn, E. H. (2018). How Innovation Drivers, Networking and Leadership Shape Public Sector Innovation Capacity. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 84(2), 288–307. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852317694085.
Lingard, B., & Sellar, S. (2013). Globalization, Edu-Business and Network Governance: The Policy Sociology of Stephen J. Ball and Rethinking Education Policy Analysis. London Review of Education, 11(3), 265–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/14748460.2013.840986.
Marsh, D. (2011). Late Modernity and the Changing Nature of Politics: Two Cheers for Henrik Bang. Critical Policy Studies, 5(1), 73–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2011.555684.
Marta, A., Suwaryo, U., Sulaeman, A., & Agustino, L. (2020). The Crisis of Democratic Governance in Contemporary Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 8(1), 109-128. https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v8i1.368.
Matei, A., Dumitru, A.S., & Antonovici, C.G. (2021). The EU Health Technology Assessment and the Open Method of Coordination: A Relation with Potential in the Context of Network Governance. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(6), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063582.
Meuleman, L., & Niestroy, I. (2015). Common but Differentiated Governance: A Metagovernance Approach to Make the SDGs Work. Sustainability (Switzerland), 7(9), 12295–12321. https://doi.org/10.3390/su70912295.
Mortelmans, D. (2019). Analyzing Qualitative Data Using NVivo. In The Palgrave Handbook of Methods for Media Policy Research, 435–450. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16065-4_25.
Muir, J., & Mullins, D. (2015). The Governance of Mandated Partnerships: The Case of Social Housing Procurement. Housing Studies, 30(6), 967–986. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2014.995070.
Munn, Z., Peters, M.D.J., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic Review or Scoping Review? Guidance for Authors when Choosing between a Systematic or Scoping Review Approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(143), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x.
Netelenbos, B. (2020). Bringing back Max Weber into Network Governance Research. Critical Policy Studies, 14(1), 67–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2018.1523738.
O’Neill, J. (2017). Contesting PLD Services: The Case of CORE Education. Open Review of Educational Research, 4(1), 192–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/23265507.2017.1394799.
Ottens, M., & Edelenbos, J. (2019). Political Leadership as Meta-Governance in Sustainability Transitions: A Case Study Analysis of Meta-Governance in the Case of the Dutch National Agreement on Climate. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11010110.
Parker, R., & Hine, D. (2015). Enterprise Policy and the Metagovernance of Firm Capabilities. Administration and Society, 47(6), 656–679. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399712473982.
Player-Koro, C., Jobér, A., & Bergviken Rensfeldt, A. (2022). De-politicised Effects with Networked Governance? An Event Ethnography Study on Education Trade Fairs. Ethnography and Education, 17(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457823.2021.1976661.
Ricard, L.M., Klijn, E.H., Lewis, J.M., & Ysa, T. (2017). Assessing Public Leadership Styles for Innovation: A Comparison of Copenhagen, Rotterdam and Barcelona. Public Management Review, 19(2), 134–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2016.1148192.
Rye, T., & Isaksson, K. (2018). Workshop 4 Report: Criteria for Successful Collaboration. Research in Transportation Economics, 69(November), 344–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2018.08.004.
Seo, B.K., & Joo, Y.M. (2019). Innovation or Episodes? Multi-Scalar Analysis of Governance Change in Urban Regeneration Policy in South Korea. Cities, 92(February), 27–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.03.010.
Stevenson, L., Honingh, M., & Neeleman, A. (2021). Dutch Boards Governing Multiple Schools: Navigating Between Autonomy and Expectations. School Leadership and Management, 41(4–5), 370–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2021.1945024.
Swe, Y. L. W., & Lim, S. (2019). Associations Between the Mixture of Governance Modes and the Performance of Local Public Service Delivery. Politics and Governance, 7(4), 301–314. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v7i4.2218.
Tando, C., Sudarmo, S., & Haryanti, R. (2021). Conflict Resolution in the Performance of Collaborative Governance: A Systematic Literature Review. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 9(1), 161-178. https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v9i1.486.
Torfing, J., Ferlie, E., Jukić, T., & Ongaro, E. (2021). A Theoretical Framework for Studying the Co-Creation of Innovative Solutions and Public Value. Policy and Politics, 49(2), 189–209. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557321X16108172803520.
van Bortel, G. (2009). Network Governance in Action: The Case of Groningen Complex Decision-Making in Urban Regeneration. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 24(2), 167–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-009-9138-0.
van Bortel, G., & Mullins, D. (2009). Critical Perspectives on Network Governance in Urban Regeneration, Community Involvement and Integration. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 24(2), 203–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-009-9140-6.
van Dorp, E. J. (2018). Trapped in the hierarchy: The Craft of Dutch City Managers. Public Management Review, 20(8), 1228–1245. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1383783.
van Duijn, S., Bannink, D., & Ybema, S. (2022). Working Toward Network Governance: Local Actors’ Strategies for Navigating Tensions in Localized Health Care Governance. Administration and Society, 54(4), 660–689. https://doi.org/10.1177/00953997211033818
Voiculescu, A. (2018). Intersecting Spheres of Analysis in Business and Human Rights: Developing a New Socio-Legal Research Agenda and Methodology for UN Guiding Principle No 9. Nordic Journal of Human Rights, 36(4), 333–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/18918131.2018.1547524.
Vydra, S., & Klievink, B. (2019). Techno-Optimism and Policy-Pessimism in the Public Sector Big Data Debate. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.05.010.
Wagner, P. M., Torney, D., & Ylä-Anttila, T. (2021). Governing a Multilevel and Cross-Sectoral Climate Policy Implementation Network. Environmental Policy and Governance, 31(5), 417–431. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1942.
Wang, H., Xiong, W., Wu, G., & Zhu, D. (2018). Public–Private Partnership in Public Administration Discipline: A Literature Review. Public Management Review, 20(2), 293–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1313445.
Whetsell, T. A., Leiblein, M. J., & Wagner, C. S. (2020). Between Promise and Performance: Science and Technology Policy Implementation Through Network Governance. Science and Public Policy, 47(1), 78–91. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scz048.
Yu, K. (2022). State-Centred-Collaborative-Governance: A “New” Governance Model for ICT Success. Cogent Social Sciences, 8(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2022.2058678.
Zhao, N., Liu, Y., & Wang, J. (2021). Network Governance and the Evolving Urban Regeneration Policymaking in China: A Case Study of Insurgent Practices in Redevelopment project. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(4), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042280.
Zulkarnain, F., Muhammad, A. Y., Sule, B., & Sahid, A. A. (2022). When The East Meets the West: Analysing Rached Ghannouci’s synthesis of democracy in Islam. Journal of Al-Tamaddun, 17(2), 127–141. https://doi.org/10.22452/jat.vol17no2.10.
Published
2024-01-30
How to Cite
TUKIJAN, Tukijan et al. A Critical Network Governance Issues in Social Sciences Discipline: A Literature Review. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, [S.l.], v. 12, n. 1, p. 429-454, jan. 2024. ISSN 2443-2067. Available at: <https://journal.scadindependent.org/index.php/jipeuradeun/article/view/831>. Date accessed: 20 july 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v12i1.831.