Effectiveness of Interdisciplinary Teaching Approach on Cognitive Structure About Proteins
Abstract
In this study, the effect of teaching the subject of proteins with an interdisciplinary approach on students' cognitive structures was investigated. For this purpose, it was examined whether a course taught with an interdisciplinary approach effectively develops different perspectives and establishes relationships between concepts belonging to different disciplines. The study group in this research, which used a quasi-experimental design, was composed of 28 high school students (14 of whom were assigned to the experimental group and 14 to the control group). The subject of proteins was taught to the control group in a disciplinary approach while to the experimental group in an interdisciplinary approach. The effects of the approaches on students' cognitive structures were determined using a word association test. The answers obtained from the word association test were analyzed by qualitative content analysis. As a result of the analysis, models were created that show the change in the student's cognitive structures. As a result of the research, it was observed that the interdisciplinary approach increased the students' ability to think in the framework of different disciplines.
References
Chrysostomou, S. (2004). Interdisciplinary Approaches in the New Curriculum in Greece: A Focus on Music Education. Arts Education Policy Review, 105(5), 23-29. https://doi.org/10.3200/AEPR.105.5.23-30
Cluck, N. A. (1980). Reflections in the İnterdisciplinary Approach to the Humanities. Liberal Education, 66(1), 67–77.
Cordogan, S., & Stanciak, L. (2000, April). An Examination of the Effects of an Interdisciplinary Curriculum Program on Behavior and Academic Performance in a Suburban High School (A Compilation from the First Three Years of a Four-Year Study). Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE Publications.
Edeer, S. (2005). Interdisciplinary Approach in Art Education. Ondokuz Mayis University Journal of Education Faculty, pp. 19, 78–84.
Erickson, H. L. (1995). Stirring the Head, Heart, and Soul: Redefining Curriculum and İnstruction. Corwin Press.
Fisher, K. M. (1985). A Misconception in Biology: Amino Acids and Translation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 22(1), 53–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660220105
Francis, J. W., & Sellers, J. A. (1994). Studying Amino Acid Sequences Using Word Processing Programs. American Biology Teacher, 56(8), 484–487. https://doi.org/10.2307/4449893
Guven, G., & Sulun, Y. (2018). Investigation of the Effect of the Interdisciplinary Instructional Approach on Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Cognitive Structure about the Concept of Energy. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12 (1), 249-28. doi: 10.17522/balikesirnef.437753
Hovardas, T., & Korfiatis, K. J. (2006). Word Associations as a Tool for Assessing Conceptual Change in Science Education. Learning and Instruction, 16, 416-432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.09.003
Jacobs, H. H. (1989). The Growing Need for Interdisciplinary Curriculum Content. In H. H. Jacobs (Ed.), Interdisciplinary Curriculum Design and Implementation (pp. 1–11). Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD).
Kline, S. J. (1995). Conceptual Foundations for Multidisciplinary Thinking. Stanford University Pres.
MacKenzie, A. H. (2020). Why Science Teachers Must Employ İnterdisciplinary Science Methods to Save the World Breadcrumb? The Science Teacher, 88(2), 6-7.
Mayring, P. (2002). Einführung in Die Qualitative Sozialforschung. Beltz Verlag.
National Research Council. (1996). National Science Education Standards. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/4962.
Putica, K., & Trivić, D. (2017). Improving High-School Students' Conceptual Understanding and Functionalization of Knowledge about Digestion Through the Application of the Interdisciplinary Teaching Approach. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 16(1), 123–139.
Sato, M., & James, P. (1999). “Nature” and “Environment” as Perceived by University Students and their Supervisors. International Journal of Environmental Education and Information, 18(2), 165–172.
Sinan, O., Yildirim, O., Kocakulah, M. S., & Aydin, H. (2006). Pre-Service Primary Science Teachers' Misconceptions about Proteins, Enzymes, and Protein Synthesis. Gazi University Journal of Gazi Educational Faculty, 26(1), 1-16.
Stember, M. (1998). Advancing the Social Sciences Through the İnterdisciplinary Enterprise. In W. H. Newell (Ed.), Interdisciplinarity: Essays from the literature. College Entrance Examination Board.
White, D. J., & Carpenter, J. P. (2008). Integrating Mathematics into the İntroductory Biology Laboratory Course. ProQuest Science Journals, 8(1), 22–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970701753415
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: (1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC-BY-SA) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal; (2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal; (3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
