Questioning the Contitutionality of Amandement Aceh’s Autonomy Law by Central Government: Who has the Authority?
Abstract
This article criticized the decision of the House of Representatives of the Republic of Indonesia (Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Republik Indonesia-DPR RI) to amend several articles regarding Aceh's autonomy authorities. The DPR RI should consult the norms of Aceh's autonomy to Aceh's Parliament. Unfortunately, the DPR RI tended to consult and involve Aceh's Parliament before making decisions. Most of the decisions regarding Aceh's autonomy had been decided by the DPR RI, creating a potential conflict of regulation in the year to come and distrust between central and provincial governments. This article used a qualitative method with the black letter law approach concerning some regulations as the primary data. The author claimed that the central government had ignored the principle of checks and balances between the central dan provincial governments and also broke the principle of consultation as stated in Law Number 11 of 2006 concerning the Aceh Government.
References
Abrar, M., Bambang, J., Muhammad, F., & Hakim, B. D. (2020). The Impact of Special Autonomy Funds on Poverty of Human Development and Unemployment in Aceh. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity, and Change, 12(10).
Academic Draft of the Aceh Governance Bill, Ministry of Home Affairs. (2006).
Aldeia, J., & Alves, F. (2019). Against the Environment. Problems in Society/ Nature Relations. Frontiers in Sociology, 4(29).
Armia, Muhammad Siddiq, Zahlul Pasha Karim, Sarong, A. H., Zulhilmi, M., & Bin-armia, M. S. (2022). Criticizing the Verdict of 18/JN/2016/MS. MBO of Mahkamah Syar’iyah Meulaboh Aceh on Sexual Abuse against Children from the Perspective of Restorative Justice. Al-Ihkam: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pranata Sosia, 17(1), 113–135.
Armia, M. S. (2017). Autonomy in Aceh-Indonesia, from Armed Conflict to Regulation Conflict. Ar-Raniry International Conference on Islamic Studies.
Armia, M. S. (2018). Ultra Petita and the Threat to Constitutional Justice: The Indonesian Experience. Intellectual Discourse, 26(2).
Aspinall, E. (2005). The Helsinki Agreement: A more promising basis for Peace in Aceh?
Barter, S. (2017). Under a Rebel Flag: Social Resistance under Insurgent Rule in Aceh. Journal of Resistance Studies, 3(1).
Basri, H., & Nabiha, A. S. (2014). Accountability of local government: The case of Aceh Province, Indonesia. Asia Pacific Journal of Accounting and Finance, 3(1).
Bauw, L. (2016). Special Autonomy of Papua: A Review from the Perspective of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia. Papua Law Journal, 1(1).
Chairul Fahmi, & Muhammad Siddiq Armia. (2022). Protecting Indigenous Collective Land Property in Indonesia under International Human Rights Norms. Journal of Southeast Asian Human Rights, 6(1).
Delivered in a Meeting with the DPR RI Expertise Board Data Collection Team at the Aceh Governor’s Office, Banda Aceh, on 13 February 2020. (2020).
Dewantara, J. A., Suhendar, I. F., Rosyid, R., & Atmaja, T. S. (2019). Pancasila as Ideology and Characteristics Civic Education in Indonesia. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Studie, 1(5).
Emilia, S., Andini, M., & Asbari, M. (2022). Pancasila as a Paradigm of Legal Development in Indonesia. Journal of Information Systems and Management (JISMA), 1(2).
Flückiger, A. (2016). The Ambiguous Principle of the Clarity of the Law. In Obscurity and clarity in the law. Routledge.
Freiman, C. (2017). Unequivocal Justice. Routledge.
Huda, Y. (2020). Islamic Sharia in Aceh and its Implications in Other Regions in Indonesia. Petita : Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Syariah, 5(2).
Jalil, H., Yani, A., & Kurniawan, A. (2019). Optimization of Special Autonomy Funds Allocation to Alleviate Poverty in Aceh (A Case Study in Districts/ Cities). International Journal of Innovation, Creativity, and Change, 9(4), 93–108.
Karim, Z. P. (2019). Sengkarut Lembaga Pemilu di Antara Tiga Aturan: Studi Terhadap KIP Aceh. Evaluasi Pemilu Serentak 2019 Bidang Evaluasi Aspek Hukum Pemilu, 48(2), 123–154.
Ker-Lindsay, J. (2012). The Foreign Policy of Counter Secession: Preventing the Recognition of Contested States. Oxford University Pres.
Kogelmann, B. (2017). Justice, Diversity, and the Well-Ordered Society. The Philosophical Quarterly, 67(269).
Law Number 11 of 2006 Concerning the Aceh Government.
Lee, T. (2020). Political Orders and Peace-Building: Ending the Aceh Conflict. Conflict, Security & Development, 20(1).
Lequesne, C., & Paquin, S. (2017). Federalism, Para Diplomacy and Foreign Policy: A Case of Mutual Neglect. International Negotiation, 22(2).
Lewis, B. D. (2020). How do Mayors get Elected? The Causal Effects of Pre-Electoral Coalitions on Mayoral Election Outcomes in Indonesia. Local Government Studies, 46(3).
Lukito, R. (2019). Shariah And The Politics Of Pluralism in Indonesia: Understanding State’s Rational Approach to Adat and Islamic Law. Petita : Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Syariah. https://doi.org/10.22373/petita.v4i1.8
May, B. (2008). The Law on the Governing of Aceh: The Way Forward or a Source of Conflicts. An International Review of Peace Initiatives, 20(42).
McGibbon, R. (2004). Secessionist Challenges in Aceh and Papua: Is Special Autonomy the Solution?
Mita, A. R. (2019). Textual Analysis of the Power of the Government of Indonesia and Aceh in the Helsinki MoU. Teknosastik, 17(1).
Muda, I. (2017). The Effect of Allocation of Dividend of the Regional Government-Owned Enterprises and the Empowerment Efforts on the Revenue of Regional Government: The Case of Indonesia. European Research Studies Journal, 20(4B).
Muhammad, & Rosmawardani. (2020). Analysis of Absolute Competence of District Courts and Syari’ah Courts. Petita : Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Syariah, 5(2).
Mutiara Fahmi, Zahlul Pasha, & Khairil Akbar. (2020). Sengkarut Pola Hubungan Lembaga Penyelenggara Pemilu di Daerah Otonomi Khusus. Al-Daulah: Jurnal Hukum dan Perundangan Islam, 10(2), 1–31.
Orba, M. S. (2012). Understanding of Identical Politics in the Indonesia Local Election: Critical Analysis of Political Election Context Literature. International Journal of Social Sciences, 4(1).
P, R. O. (2008). Welfare and the Civil Peace: Poverty with Rights? In Whose Peace? Critical Perspectives on the Political Economy of Peacebuilding. Palgrave Macmillan.
Pasha, Z. (2018). Lembaga Penyelenggara Pemilu di Aceh (Studi atas Pencabutan Pasal 57 & Pasal 60 ayat (1), ayat (2), dan ayat (4) Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2006 tentang Pemerintahan Aceh melalui Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2017 Tentang Pemilihan Umum). Universitas Gadjah Mada.
Pippa, N. (2012). Making Democratic Governance Work: How Regimes Shape Prosperity, Welfare, and Peace. Cambridge University Press.
Pleasence, P, & Balmer, N. J. (2019). Justice & the Capability to Function in Society. Daedalus, 148(1).
Qonita Royani Salpina, Rusjdi Ali Muhammad, & Yenny Sri Wahyuni. (2018). Kedudukan Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) Helsinki dalam Pembentukan Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2006 Tentang Pemerintahan Aceh. Petita : Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Syariah, 1(1).
Shen, Q. (2020). Research on the Application of Regional Cultural Visual Language in the Packaging Design of Local Specialties. The 6th International Conference on Arts, Design and Contemporary Education (ICADCE 2020).
Siahaan C, & Tampubolon, M. (2021). Electoral Manipulation In Indonesia’s 2019 National Election. Journal of Positive Psychology & Wellbeing, 5(4).
Suryadinata, L. (2005). Indonesia: The Year of a Democratic Election. Southeast Asian Affairs, 1.
Taydas Zeynep, & Dursun Peksen. (2012). Can States Buy Peace? Social Welfare Spending and Civil Conflicts. Journal of Peace Research, 49(2).

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: (1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC-BY-SA) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal; (2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal; (3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).