Analysis of the “Deep Listening” Spiritual Pedagogy Approach in Online Learning to Build Intersubjectivity

  • Yuliana TB Tacoh Satya Wacana Christian University, Indonesia


Online learning is often complained about as it makes students uncomfortable and inactive in learning activities because they need to meet face-to-face with classmates and teachers. This article explained how in the online learning model, students could feel involved with all learning components even if they were not face-to-face while using the “deep listening” spiritual pedagogy approach. The practice of “deep listening” pedagogy was carried out on students in the General Basic Course lecture class, namely Religious Education, with 35 students. The goal was to encourage student engagement and the ability to connect with all components in the learning classroom. Data were collected through observation and implementation of “deep listening” practice through focus group discussion, then analyzed with a qualitative approach. The result showed that through observation and practice of “deep listening” in the focus of online group discussions, 1) students could convey their inner voice openly and honestly. 2) It can be observed through conversations that there were changes in students’ perceptions about the meaning of beliefs, human nature, religious experiences, relationships with others, and the development of spirituality. 3) It can be observed that students’ ability to engage and feel connected to all components of learning was a meaning of intersubjectivity through opinions and thoughts conveyed in online learning.


Bhagwan, R. (2011). Spirituality in Pedagogy: A Qualitative Study With Educators. Social Work, 47(4), 511–520.
Bozkurt, A., & Sharma, R. C. (2020). Emergency Remote Teaching in a Global Crisis Due to the Coronavirus Pandemic Contemporary Teaching and Learning Techniques for Distance Education View Project Virtual Reality View Project. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 1–6.
Bruner, J. (1989). Realidad Mental Y Mundos Posibles. Una Versión de Este Capítulo Apareció En Social Research, 49, N°. 4, 1982, Págs. 835-853, 49, 835–853.
Charles Hodges, Stephanie Moore, Barb Lockee, T. T. & A. B. (2020). View the Full-Text Article Online:
Di Gesú, M. G. (2021). Building Intersubjectivity in Online Learning: Pupils’ and University Students’ Perception of Teachers’ Social Presence in Technology-Mediated Teaching and Learning Processes. Human Arenas, 4(2), 338–349.
Harlos, K. P. (2000). Toward a Spiritual Pedagogy: Meaning, Practice, and Applications in Management Education. Journal of Management Education, 24(5), 612–627.
Jones, L. (2010). What Does Spirituality in Education Mean? Journal of College and Character, 6(7).
Joshi, O., Chapagain, B., Kharel, G., Poudyal, N. C., Murray, B. D., & Mehmood, S. R. (2020). No Title Benefits and Challenges of Online Instruction in Agriculture and Natural Resource Education. Interactive Learning Environments. Interactive Learning Environments, 30:8, 1402–1413, p. 30.
Laryea, K. (2018). A Pedagogy of Deep Listening in E-Learning. 11(11).
Lim, J., Jeong, A. C., Hall, B. M., & Freed, S. (2017). Intersubjectivity and Discussion Characteristics in Online Courses. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 18(1), 29–44.
Lowe, M. (2010). A Summary of the Findings of the Study : Assessing the Impact of Online Courses on the Spiritual Formation of Adult Students. Distance Education, 4(1).
Masbur, M. (2022). A Spiritual Pedagogic Approach to Learning (Analytical Study of Approach Model). Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 10(2), 353-370.
Murtadho, A., Hidayanti, E., Fakhri, M., Masri, S., Purwanti, K. L., Algifahmy, A. F., & Hakim, L. (2022). Religious Coping for Covid-19 Patients: Islamic Approaches. Journal of Al-Tamaddun, 17(1), 31–42.
Miles, M. B., Matthew B. Miles, A. Michael Huberman, Johnny Saldaña, A. S. U., & Edition., — Third. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: a Methods Sourcebook (Edition.,). Arizona State University. Edition., — Third.
Miller, L., & Athan, A. (2007). Spiritual Awareness Pedagogy: The Classroom as a Spiritual Reality. International Journal of Children’s Spirituality, 12(1), 17–35.
Potgieter, F. J. (2015). Towards a Spirituality of Open Distance Learning. Progressio, 37(2), 64–78.
Schneider, Dana A. and Keenan, E. K. (2015). From Being Known in the Classroom to "Moments of Meeting: What Intersubjectivity Offers Contemplative Pedagogy", Journal of Contemplative Inquiry: Vol. 2: No. 1, Article 4., Vol. 2: No.
Sentz, J. A. (2020). Interpersonal Aspects of Instructional Designers as Change Agents in Higher Education the Balancing Act: 58–79.
Shahjahan, R. A. (2004). Centering Spirituality in the Academy: Toward a Transformative Way of Teaching and Learning. Journal of Transformative Education, 2(4), 294–312.
Soslau, E. G. (2015). Exploring Intersubjectivity Between Student Teachers and Field Instructors in Student Teaching Conferences. Cogent Education, 2(1).
Su, B., Bonk, C. J., Magjuka, R. J., Liu, X., & Lee, S. H. (2005). The Importance of Interaction in Web-Based Education: A program-Level Case Study of Online MBA Courses. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 4(1), 1–19.
Syihabuddin, S. (2017). Spiritual Pedagogy: An Analysis of the Foundation of Values in the Perspective of Best Performing Teachers. International Journal of Education, 10(1), 27.
Tallent-Runnels, M. K., Thomas, J. A., Lan, W. Y., Cooper, S., Ahern, T. C., Shaw, S. M., & Liu, X. (2006). Teaching Courses Online: A Review of the Research. Review of Educational Research, 76(1), 93–135.
How to Cite
TACOH, Yuliana TB. Analysis of the “Deep Listening” Spiritual Pedagogy Approach in Online Learning to Build Intersubjectivity. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, [S.l.], v. 11, n. 3, p. 905-924, sep. 2023. ISSN 2443-2067. Available at: <>. Date accessed: 20 july 2024. doi: