An Argumentative Discourse Analysis of the Newspaper Editorial “The 9/30 Tragedy”
Abstract
Academic studies on newspaper discourse have focused primarily on the structure of news items. Research on an argumentative discourse of newspaper editorials is understudied. By using the sociocognitive theory of knowledge and opinion as the theoretical basis, this article aims to analyze the argumentative discourse constructed in “The 9/30 Tragedy” editorial published in The Jakarta Post and to discuss whether the arguments in the text constitute knowledge or solely opinions of the editorial team on the defunct Indonesian Communist Party (PKI). The eclectic research method used the pragma-dialectical model of argumentation supported by intertextuality and vocabulary analysis. The findings reveal that the editorial has a standpoint that the tragedy of September 30, 1965, has led the course of Indonesia’s history for the worst tragedy and that the argumentation is manifested in three stages: confrontational stage, argumentation stage, and concluding stage. Acting as the protagonist, the editorial team maneuvers strategically by quoting other voices and using an evaluative lexical repertoire to support their arguments criticizing Soeharto’s leadership legacy. Overall, the editorial seems to reconstruct mental models for the readers by questioning the reliability of the military-dictated textbooks about the 9/30 Tragedy, thereby reshaping the historical knowledge about the calamity, which is justifiable.
References
Amossy, R. (2002). How to Do Things with Doxa: Toward an Analysis of Argumentation in Discourse. Poetics Today, 23(3), 465–487. https://doi.org/10.1215/03335372-23-3-465.
Amossy, R. (2009). Argumentation in Discourse: A Socio-Discursive Approach to Arguments. Informal Logic, 29(3), 252–267. https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v29i3.2843.
Azeh, A., Yunus, M. M., & Yaakob, M. T. (2023). Malay Muslim youths of suburban areas: Their tendency in electing political leaders. International Journal of Islamic Thought, 23(1), 19-26. https://doi.org/10.24035/ijit.23.2023.252
Bell, A. (1998). The Discourse Structure in the News Stories. In A. Bell, & P. Garrett (Eds.), Approaches to Media Discourse (pp. 64–104). Blackwell.
Bolívar, A. (1994). The Structure of Newspaper Editorials. In M. Coulthard (Ed.), Advances in Written Text Analysis (pp. 276–294). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203422656.
Dant, T. (1991). Knowledge, Ideology, and Discourse: A Sociological Perspective. Routledge.
Demir, Y. (2016). Maneuvering Strategically in a Press Conference to Diminish Political Responsibility for a Critical Event. Journal of Argumentation in Context, 5(2), 191–217. https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.5.2.07dem.
Fairclough, I., & Fairclough, N. (2011). Practical Reasoning in Political Discourse: The UK Government’s Response to the Economic Crisis in the 2008 Pre-Budget Report. Discourse & Society, 22(3), 243–268. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926510395439.
Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. Routledge.
Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical Discourse Analysis. 2nd ed. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315834368.
Fariana, A. (2021). Legal politics as a catalyst in forming sharia economic legal system in the Indonesia’s new order and reform era. Ijtihad: Jurnal Wacana Hukum Islam Dan Kemanusiaan, 21(2), 197–212. https://doi.org/10.18326/ijtihad.v21i2.197-212
Farrelly, M. (2020). Rethinking Intertextuality in CDA. Critical Discourse Studies, 17(4), 359–376. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2019.1609538.
Firmstone, J. (2008). The Editorial Production Process and Editorial Values as Influences on the Opinions of the British Press Towards Europe. Journalism Practice, 2(2), 212–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512780801999378.
Fisher, T. (2009). ROI in Social media: A Look at the Arguments. Journal of Database Marketing & Customer Strategy Management, 16(3), 189–195. https://doi.org/10.1057/dbm.2009.16.
Foucault, M. (2003). Archaeology of Knowledge. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203604168.
Fowler, R. (1991). Language in the News: Discourse and Ideology in the Press. Routledge.
Huda, M. C., & Ispriyarso, B. (2019). Contribution of Islamic law in the discretionary scheme that has implications for corruption. Ijtihad: Jurnal Wacana Hukum Islam Dan Kemanusiaan, 19(2), 147–167. https://doi.org/10.18326/ijtihad.v19i2.147-167
Ibrahim, F. W., Wirianto, D., & Adib, S. (2022). The Thought of Figures of Islamic Mass Organization About Caliphate: A Case Study in Banda Aceh and West Java. Jurnal Ilmiah Islam Futura, 22(2), 164. https://doi.org/10.22373/jiif.v22i2.9396
Katajamäki, H., & Koskela, M. (2006). The Rhetorical Structure of Editorials in English, Swedish and Finnish Business Newspapers. Teoksessa Proceedings of the 5th International AELFE Conference, 215–219.
Le, E. (2010). Editorials and the Power of Media. John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.35.
Marques, F. P. J., & Mont’Alverne, C. (2021). What are Newspaper Editorials Interested in? Understanding the Idea of Criteria of Editorial-Worthiness. Journalism, 22(7), 1812–1830. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884919828503.
Muwafiq, A. Z., Sumarlam, S., & Kristina, D. (2019). Discursive Strategies of Verbal Violence in the Users Comments on Facebook News Updates. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 7(3), 413–432. https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v7i3.297.
Pollak, S., Coesemans, R., Daelemans, W., & Lavrač, N. (2022). Detecting Contrast Patterns in Newspaper Articles by Combining Discourse Analysis and Text Mining. Pragmatics, 21(4), 647–683. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.21.4.07pol.
Poutanen, M. (2019). Business Logics: Co-Option of Media Discourse by Pro-Market Arguments in the Case of Nokia in Finland. In Critical Policy Discourse Analysis (pp. 122–146). Edward Elgar.
Rahman, M.A. (2022). The Discursive Construction of Strategies for Implementing Anti-Corruption Education at State Islamic Higher Educational Institutions. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 10(3), 555–578. https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v10i3.737.
Richardson, J. E. (2017). Analysing Newspapers: An Approach from Critical Discourse Analysis. Red Globe Press.
Sabir, M., & Nazaruddin, N. (2021). Manifestation of Sharia Regional Regulations in Managing Social Morality. Juris : Jurnal Hukum Dan Ekonomi Islam, 20(2), 189. https://doi.org/10.31958/juris.v20i2.3276
Smirnova, A. V. (2009). Reported Speech as an Element of Argumentative Newspaper Discourse. Discourse & Communication, 3(1), 79–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481308098765.
Sonafist, Y., & Yuningsih, H. (2023). Islamic Law, the State, and Human Rights: The contestation of Interfaith Marriage discourse on social media in Indonesia. Juris : Jurnal Hukum Dan Ekonomi Islam, 22(2), 381. https://doi.org/10.31958/juris.v22i2.10934.
Sukti, S., Warsito, T., Qodir, Z., & Jubba, H. (2022). Political dynamics of Islamic Law in the reform Era: A study of the response of Muhammadiyah cadres in Central Kalimantan. Samarah : Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam, 6(2), 1022. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v6i2.12415
Thalal, M. (2020). Fragrances From Heaven: The Relevance of Smelling in Understanding the Early History of Islam. Jurnal Ilmiah Islam Futura, 20(1), 35. https://doi.org/10.22373/jiif.v20i1.5831
Toulmin, S. E. (2003). The Uses of Argument. Cambridge University Press.
van Dijk, T. A. (1998). Opinions and Ideologies in the Press. In A. Bell, & P. Garrett, (Eds.), Approaches to Media Discourse (pp. 1–33). Blackwell.
van Dijk, T. A. (2002). Knowledge in Parliamentary Debates. Journal of Language and Politics, 2(1), 93–129. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.2.1.06dij.
van Dijk, T. A. (2014). Discourse and Knowledge: A Sociocognitive Approach. Cambridge University Press.
van Eemeren, F. H. (2010). Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse (Vol. 2). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.2.
van Eemeren, F. H. (2018). Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective (Vol. 33). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95381-6.
van Eemeren, F. H., & Houtlosser, P. (2015). Strategic Maneuvering: Maintaining a Delicate Balance. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.) Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse (pp. 249–279). Springer.
van Eemeren, F. H., & Snoeck Henkemans, A. F. (2017). Argumentation: Analysis and Evaluation. Routledge.
Zada, K. (2023). Sharia and Islamic state in Indonesia constitutional democracy: an Aceh experience. Ijtihad: Jurnal Wacana Hukum Islam Dan Kemanusiaan, 23(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.18326/ijtihad.v23i1.1-18
Zarefsky, D. (2007). Strategic Maneuvering Through Persuasive Definitions: Implications for Dialectic and Rhetoric. Argumentation, 20(4), 399–416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-007-9030-6.
Zulkarnain, F., Muhammad, A. Y., Sule, B., & Sahid, A. A. (2022). When The East Meets the West: Analysing Rached Ghannouci’s synthesis of democracy in Islam. Journal of Al-Tamaddun, 17(2), 127–141. https://doi.org/10.22452/jat.vol17no2.10
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: (1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC-BY-SA) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal; (2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal; (3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
