DIRECTION OF MORAL EDUCATION TEACHER TO ENRICH CHARACTER EDUCATION
Abstract
This paper discusses moral education which should begin by focussing on what exactly is meant by the term “moral human being” in Character Education. This is because whatever approach is used has to be based on the exact and clear understanding of the moral human being himself. A moral human being should posses the components categorised as concept, that is, the rules and principles which are deemed necessary to be used in actions and feelings or emotions which support the belief that a concept or action should be carried out. Apart from that, a moral human being should have the moral knowledge of the surroundings, know how to interact and act according to the decisions made. Character education will enable one to be a moral human being who should know the good, desire the good and do good.
References
Abdul Rahman Md Aroff. 1986. Makna Moral. Jurnal Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (68).
Abdul Rahman Md Aroff. 1999. Pendidikan moral: Teori etika dan amalan moral. Serdang: Penerbit Universiti Putra Malaysia.
Chang Lee Hoon. 2001. Learning to teach moral education. Paper presented at Association of Moral Education Conference: Excellence in Moral Education.Vancouver, November 24-27, 2001.
Chang, Lee Hoon. 2002. Perkembangan domain moral dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran sains sosial. Kertas pembentangan Seminar kebangsaan Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran Sains Sosial. Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Malaya pada 19 Januari 2002.
Chang, Lee Hoon. 2004. Emosi moral dalam Pendidikan Moral.Seminar Pendidikan Akhlak & Moral Pembinaan Insan, 23-24 Juli 2004, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Emmet, D. 1979. The moral prism. Macmillan: London.
Gilligan, C. 1982. In a different voice : Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2001). Sukatan pelajaran pendidikan moral. Kuala Lumpur: Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum.
Narvaez, D., Getz, I., Rest, J.R., & Thoma, S.J. 1999. Individual moral judgment and cultural ideologies. Developmental Psychology, 35, 478-488.
Ewing, C.P. 1990. When children ill. The Dynamics of Juvenile Homicide.
Lickona,T. 1991. Educating for character : How our schools can teach respect and responsibility. New York: Bantam.
Noddings, N. 1984. Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education.Berkeley, CA:University of California Press.
Puka, B. (2002). The DIT and the dark side of development. Journal of Moral Education, 31, (3), 339-352.
Rest, J.R. 1983. Morality. In J.H. Flavell & E.M. Markman (Eds.). Cognitive development: Handbook of child psychology (vol. 3, pp. 556-629). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Samay, S.A. 1986. Affectivity : The power base of moral behaviour. In G.F. Mc Lean, F.E. Ellrod, D.L. Shindler & J. Character Development. New York : University Press of America.
Walker, L. J. 1999. The perceived personality of moral exemplars. Journal of Moral Education, 28, 145–162.
Walker, L. J. 2004. Gus in the gap: Bridging the judgment action gap in moral functioning. In D. K. Lapsley & D. Narvaez (Eds.), Moral development, self, and identity (pp. 1–20). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Walker, L. J., Hennig, K. H., & Krettenauer, T. 2000. Parent and peer contexts for children’s moral reasoning. Child Development, 71, 1033–1048.
Wilson, John. 1973. A teacher’s guide to moral education. London: Geoffrey Chapman.
Wright, Derek. 1971. The psychology of moral behaviour. Hazell Watson & Viney Ltd.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: (1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC-BY-SA) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal; (2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal; (3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).