The Effectiveness of English Teaching Module at Middle Schools in West Aceh
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v5i3.150Keywords:
Effectiveness, English, Teaching, Module, West AcehAbstract
The purpose of this study is to explore the effectiveness of English Teaching Module at middle schools in West Aceh. The students of middle school studying in Government public school were the population of study. The control group, as well as the experimental group, was of equal size, each has 30 students of 8th class. The significance of the difference between the scores of groups at 0.05 levels was tested by applying t-test. The result of the study showed the difference between the mean scores of the experimental and control group was found to be highly significant. The p- value was found 0. 000 (P< 0.05). The study also proved that the material designed, which was useful for slow as well as of bright students, enabled the students to comprehend difficult concepts, and kept them on the track.
References
August, D. & Hakuta, K. (Eds.) (1997). Improving schooling for language-minority children: A Research Agenda. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Barnes, J.P, Mayer, R. Alfred., & Hayman. (2000). Modularization of Curriculum at Secondary Level. London: Kogan Page.
Behlol, G. (2009). Difficulties of English Teachers in Teaching English to Secondary Classes. (Unpublished, M.ED Research Thesis, Arid Agriculture). University Rawalpindi, Pakistan.
Brown, H.D. (2000). Principles of language learning and teaching (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Cadiero, Kaplan, K., & Rodriguez, J. L. (2008). The preparation of highly qualified teachers for English Language Learners: Educational responsiveness for unmet needs. Equity and Excellence in Education, 41, 372-387.
Cummins, J. (2000). The role of Primary Language Development in Promoting Educational Success for Language Minority Students. Los Angeles: California State University.
de Jong, E.J., & Harper, C.A. (2008). ESL is Good Teaching “plus”: Preparing Standard Curriculum Teachers for All Learners. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Diknas (2010). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia No 20 tahun 2003 Tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. Jakarta: Biro Hukum dan Organisasi, Sekjen Depdiknas.
Gandara, Maxwell, & Driscoll, (2005). English Learners in California Schools: Unequal Resources, Unequal Outcomes. Educational Policy Analysis Archive, 11,36-43.
Karabenick, S., & Noda, P. (2004). Professional Development Implications of Teachers‟ Beliefs and Attitudes Towards English language learners. Bilingual Research Journal, 8,55-75.
McKeown, R., Hopkins, C. A., Rizzi, R., & Chrystalbridge, M. (2002, August 20). Education for Sustainable Development Toolkit. Retrieved November 21, 2013, from http://www.esdtoolkit.org/esd_toolkit_v2.pdf
Minkova, D. & Stockwell, R. (2001). English Words: History and Structure. Cambridge: University Press.
Rajab, T. (2015). An Applied Model of Teaching Materials to Improve Students’ Speaking Skill. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 3(1), 103-118.
Shipley, C.M., M.M. Cann., & Hildebrand, J.F.T. (2000). The Psychology of Educational Technology and Instructional Media. London: New Fetter Lane.
Stoddart, T., Pinal, A., Latzke, M. & Canaday, D. (2002). Integrating inquiry science and language development for English language learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 664-687.
Usman, M. (2015). Teaching Model of Learning English Writing at University. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 3(3), 441-450.
Wei, R. C., Darling-Hammond, L., Andree, A., Richardson, N., & Orphanos, S. (2009). Professional Learning in the Learning Profession: a Status Report on Teacher Development in the United States and Abroad. Dallas, TX: National Staff Development Council.
Yore, L. D. & Hand, B. M. (2003). Examining the Literacy Component of Science Literacy: 25 Years of Language Arts and Science Research. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 689-725.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: (1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC-BY-SA) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal; (2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal; (3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website), as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).














