Exploring Tiktok’s Impact on ESP Students’ Speaking Engagement
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v13i2.1700Keywords:
Engagement, ESP, Foreign Language Learning, Social Media, TikTokAbstract
The growing influence of social media on language acquisition has opened new avenues for enhancing student engagement in foreign language learning. However, its impact on verbal participation remains underexplored. This study investigates the role of TikTok as an instructional tool in English for Specific Purposes (ESP) speaking classes, focusing on its effectiveness in fostering student engagement. Employing a mixed-methods approach, this study integrates quantitative pre-test and post-test assessments to measure engagement levels and qualitative data from semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions to capture students’ perceptions. The findings indicate a significant increase in engagement: statistical analyses reveal notable improvements in students’ participation, while qualitative insights highlight TikTok’s capacity to enhance motivation, peer interaction, and authentic language practice. These results suggest that TikTok is a dynamic platform for improving speaking skills and engagement, offering valuable implications for educators seeking innovative teaching strategies in the digital era.
References
Anshori, I., Majid, M. R., Fitria, S., & Haq, G. F. (2024). The Role of the Cooperative Script Method in Developing Self-Confidence and Public Speaking Skills among Madrasah Ibtidaiyyah Student. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 10(2), 280–293. https://doi.org/10.15575/jpi.v10i2.39169.
Barrot, J. S. (2020). Integrating Technology into ESL/EFL Writing through Grammarly. RELC Journal, 53(3), 764–768. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688220966632.
Barrot, J. S. (2021). Effects of Facebook-Based e-Portfolio on ESL Learners’ Writing Performance. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 34(1), 95–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2020.1745822.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
Brown, H. D. (2019). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching (6th ed.). Pearson.
Canani, M., & Zulli, T. (2022). ELT and Social Media: Integrating TikTok into Class Practice. MediAzioni, 34, 165–183. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1974-4382/15555.
Che Lah, N. H., Eriansah, J. R., Mustafa, W. A., Hanafi, H. F., Ghani, M. M., Al-Jawahry, H. M., Hamizan, M. H., Hashim, S., Jumaat, N. F., & Almoussawi, Z. A. (2023). The Usefulness and Students’ Perception of TikTok Application as a Learning Tool in Higher Education. 3rd IEEE International Conference on Mobile Networks and Wireless Communications (ICMNWC 2023), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMNWC60182.2023.10435929.
Cole, M., & Scribner, S. (1978). Introduction to Vygotsky’s Mind in Society. Harvard University Press.
Curry, D. (2024). TikTok App Report 2024: Holistic Overview of the Most Popular App of the Past Three Years. Business of Apps.
Dewi, D. S., Waloyo, E., & Ria, T. N. (2023). The Impact of Technology-Based Learning on Students’ Affective, Behavioral, And Cognitive Engagement in EFL Higher Education. In Proceedings of UNNES-TEFLIN National Conference, 5, pp. 167-179. https://proceeding.unnes.ac.id/utnc/article/view/2607.
Eaton, P. W. (2015). Engaging Students through Social Media: Evidence-Based Practices for use in Student Affairs by Reynol Junco (review). Journal of College Student Development, 56(3), 313–316. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2015.0028.
Escamilla-Fajardo, P., Alguacil, M., & López-Carril, S. (2021). Incorporating TikTok in Higher Education: Pedagogical Perspectives from a Corporal Expression Sport Sciences Course. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism Education, 28, 100302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2021.100302.
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059.
Fredricks, J.A., Blumenfeld, P., Friedel, J., & Paris, A. (2005). School Engagement. In: Moore, K.A., Lippman, L.H. (eds) What do Children Need to Flourish?. The Search Institute Series on Developmentally Attentive Community and Society, vol 3, pp 305–321. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-23823-9_19.
Gao, H., & Liu, S. (2023). An Investigation on the Enactment of Native-Speakerism on Social Media in China: A Critical Discourse Perspective. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 15, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.54097/ehss.v15i.9051.
Gunduz, N., & Hursen, C. (2015). Constructivism in Teaching and Learning; Content Analysis Evaluation. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 526–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.640.
Hanani, N., Ahid, N., & Sufirmansyah. (2024). An Eclectic Approach to Arabic Language Education: Implementing Kitab Al-Amtsilah At-Tashrifiyah in Modern Indonesian Pesantrens. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 10(2), 29–42. https://doi.org/10.15575/jpi.v10i2.38651.
Hazzam, J., & Wilkins, S. (2023). The Influences of Lecturer Charismatic Leadership and Technology use on Student Online Engagement, Learning Performance, and Satisfaction. Computers & Education, 200, 104809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104809.
Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2014). Students’ and Instructors’ use of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs): Motivations and Challenges. Educational Research Review, 12, 45–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2014.05.001.
Indrayadi, T., Mulyono, H., Ningsih, S. K., & Mukminin, A. (2024). Pronunciation Learning Attitudes: The Case of EFL Undergraduate Students in Indonesia. Studies in English Language and Education, 11(2), 695–709. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v11i2.30781.
Jariah, A. & Rahmaniah, R. (2024). Enhancing Speaking Skills through Digital Storytelling in EFL Classrooms. In Proceeding International Undergraduate Conference on English Education. 489-495. https://seminar.uad.ac.id/index.php/IUCEE2022/index.
Kabilan, M. K., Ahmad, N., & Abidin, M. J. Z. (2010). Facebook: An Online Environment for Learning of English in Institutions of Higher Education? Internet and Higher Education, 13(4), 179–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.07.003.
Khlaif, Z. N., & Salha, S. (2021). Using TikTok in Education: A Form of Micro-Learning or Nano-Learning? Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences, 12(3), 213–218. https://doi.org/10.30476/ijvlms.2021.90211.1087.
Li, L., Zhang, R., & Piper, A. M. (2023). Predictors of Student Engagement and Perceived Learning in Emergency Online Education Amidst COVID-19: A Community of Inquiry Perspective. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 12, 100326. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHBR.2023.100326.
Limbong, E., & Wadham, B. (2024). Exploring Pre-Service English Teachers’ Digital Competence in Creating Interactive Instructional Materials. Studies in English Language and Education, 11(2), 748–767. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v11i2.35103.
Manca, S., & Ranieri, M. (2016). Facebook and the Others: Potentials and Obstacles of Social Media for Teaching in Higher Education. Computers & Education, 95, 216–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.01.012.
Mao, J. (2014). Social Media for Learning: A Mixed-Methods Study on High School Students’ Technology Affordances and Perspectives. Computers in Human Behavior, 33, 213–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.002.
Miserandino, M. (1996). Children who do Well in School: Individual Differences in Perceived Competence and Autonomy in Above-Average Children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(2), 203–214. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.88.2.203.
Mohd Yusoff, M. Z., Hamzah, A., Fajri, I., ZA, T., & Yusuf, S. M. (2022). The Effect of Spiritual and Social Norm in Moral Judgement. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 27(1), 555–568. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2022.2156799.
Muhammad AR., Suhaimi, Sulaiman, S., & Tabrani ZA. (2023). Education strategies to prevent child abuse in Aceh, Indonesia: Women and Child Empowerment Center and Protection Unit. Multidisciplinary Reviews, 6(2), 2023018. https://doi.org/10.31893/multirev.2023018.
Napu, N. (2024). Linguistic Landscapes in Multilingual Urban Settings: Insights from Translation Perspectives. Studies in English Language and Education, 11(1), 530–548. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v11i1.29559.
Panigrahi, R., Srivastava, P. R., & Panigrahi, P. K. (2021). Effectiveness of e-Learning: The Mediating Role of Student Engagement on Perceived Learning Effectiveness. Information Technology & People, 34(7), 1840–1862. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-07-2019-0380.
Panigrahi, R., Srivastava, P. R., & Sharma, D. (2018). Online Learning: Adoption, Engagement and Learning Outcome—A Review of Literature. International Journal of Information Management, 43, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.05.005.
Paul, J. Z., & Friginal, E. (2019). The Effects of Symmetric and Asymmetric Social Networks on Second Language Communication. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(5–6), 587–618. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1527364.
Rahman, M. S. (2021). Analysis Regression and Path Model: the Influence Both Instagram and TikTok in Improving Students’ Vocabulary. SKETCH JOURNAL: Journal of English Teaching, Literature and Linguistics, 1(1), 10-22. https://jurnalstairakha.com/index.php/SKETCH/article/view/152.
Saragih, E., Zein, T. T., & Sumbayak, D. M. (2023). Contextualizing Corrective Feedback in Scientific Writing through Online Learning Platforms. Studies in English Language and Education, 10(3), 1216–1235. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v10i3.25867.
Shneiderman, B., Borkowski, E.Y., Alavi, M., & Norman, K. (1998). Emergent Patterns of Teaching/ Learning in Electronic Classrooms. ETR&D, 46, 23–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299671.
Skinner, E. A., Kindermann, T. A., & Furrer, C. J. (2009). A Motivational Perspective on Engagement and Disaffection: Conceptualization and Assessment of Children’s Behavioral and Emotional Participation in Academic Activities in the Classroom. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69(3), 493-525. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164408323233.
Szobonya, P., & Roche, C. (2021). Intercultural Youth: The Global Generation and Virtual Exchange. In Virtual Exchange: Towards Digital Equity in Internationalisation, pp. 17-28. http://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2021.53.1286.
Tabrani, Z. A., Walidin, W., Idris, S., & Huda, M. (2024). Pancasila as the Core Value for Character Building in Islamic Higher Education Institutions. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 12(2), 565–592. https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v12i2.1212.
Tabrani, Z. A., Idris, S., Yusoff, M. N., Siswanto, R., & Murziqin, R. (2023). Strategy on boarding school development: between trend and performance analysis. Multidisciplinary Reviews, 6(2), 2023013. https://doi.org/10.31893/multirev.2023013.
Tas, Y. (2016). The Contribution of Perceived Classroom Learning Environment and Motivation to Student Engagement in Science. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 31(4), 557–577. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-016-0303-z.
Veiga, F., Reeve, J., Wentzel, K., & Robu, V. (2014). Assessing Students’ Engagement: A Review of Instruments with Psychometric Qualities. In F. Veiga (Coord.), Envolvimento dos Alunos na Escola: Perspetivas Internacionais da Psicologia e Educação / Students’ Engagement in School: International Perspectives of Psychology and Education (pp. 38-57). Lisboa: Instituto de Educação da Universidade de Lisboa. https://repositorio.ulisboa.pt/handle/10451/18036.
Walidin, W., Idris, S., & Tabrani ZA. (2015). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif & Grounded Theory. Banda Aceh: FTK Ar-Raniry Press.
Walidin, W., Idris, S., & Tabrani ZA. (2023). Metodologi Penelitian Berbasis Fenomenologis. Yogyakarta: Darussalam Publishing
Walker, C. O., Greene, B. A., & Mansell, R. A. (2006). Identification with Academics, Intrinsic/ Extrinsic Motivation, and Self-Efficacy as Predictors of Cognitive Engagement. Learning and Individual Differences, 16(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2005.06.004.
Yang, H. (2020). Secondary-School Students’ Perspectives of Utilizing TikTok for English Learning in and Beyond the EFL Classroom. English Teaching & Scholarship Studies, 162–183. https://clausiuspress.com/conference/article/artId/5484.html.
Yoyo, Hussin, M., Rahman, A., Zaini, A. R., & Sutipyo, R. (2023). Cultural Perceptions of Santri on Arabic Language Learning. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 9(2), 187–198. https://doi.org/10.15575/jpi.v9i2.24103.
Zepke, N., Leach, L., & Butler, P. (2010). Student Engagement: What is it and what Influences it? Report in Teaching & Learning Research Initiative, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/13596740903565269.
Zhang, W., Zhang, W., & Daim, T. U. (2023). Investigating Consumer Purchase Intention in Online Social Media Marketing: A Case Study of TikTok. Technology in Society, 74, 102289. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TECHSOC.2023.102289.
Zilvinskis, J., Masseria, A. A., & Pike, G. R. (2017). Student Engagement and Student Learning: Examining the Convergent and Discriminant Validity of the Revised National Survey of Student Engagement. Res High Educ 58, 880-903. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-017-9450-6.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Vinsensia Anisa Citta Erydani, Sri Wuli Fitriati, Widhiyanto Widhiyanto, Januarius Mujiyanto, Achmad Hilal Madjdi (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: (1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC-BY-SA) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal; (2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal; (3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website), as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
