From Instruction to Consultative: Reposition of Pesantren in the Collaboration of Religious Radicalization Policy in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v9i1.407Keywords:
Pondok Pesantren, Organization Design, Religious DeradicalizationAbstract
This study examined the urgency of the reconstruction of the Pondok pesantren position in the religious de-radicalization policy in Indonesia. Islamic boarding school (henceforth: Pondok Pesantren) yet is only positioned as a subordinate institution or as an object of de-radicalization policy in the collaboration of institutional design. As a result, the relationship model that is built is the instructive pattern from the government to Pondok pesantren. This, factually, does not contribute to the positive effect on the effectiveness of the de-radicalization policy. The question of this research was how the relationship model or ideal position of Pondok pesantren in the collaboration of institutional design in religious de-radicalization policy? The research data were collected through interviews, documentation, and literature study, which then were analyzed descriptively. This study summed up that the consultative model would guarantee more toward the support of institutional design in the collaboration of religious de-radicalization policy in Indonesia; to protect the unity of the nation on one hand, and optimize the role of Pondok pesantren on the other hand.
References
Ahmed, Akbar S. (2004). Islam Sebagai Tertuduh. Bandung: Arasy Mizan.
Ansell, C., & Gash, Allison. (2007). Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. Published by Oxford University Press. JPART 18, p. 543-571.
Azra, Azzumardi. (1999). Pergolakan Politik Islam: Dari Fundamentalisme, Modernisme Hingga Post-modernisme. Jakarta: Paramadina.
Bakti, Surya. (2014). Darurat Terorisme: Kebijakan Pencegahan, Perlindungan, dan Deradikalisasi. Jakarta: Daulat Press.
Basori, Yana Fajar dan Mukhlis, Maulana. (2017). Advokasi Organisasi Masyarakat Sipil Dalam Mendorong Kebijakan Distribusi Penguasaan Lahan. Prosiding Seminar Nasional FISIP Universitas Lampung (SEFILA 2) bertema “Membangun Etika Sosial Politik Menuju Masyarakat yang Berkeadilan”.
Creswell, John W. (2010). Research Design, Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed (Edisi Ketiga). Terjemahan Akhmad Fawaid. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Fatimatuzzahroh, F., Abdoellah, O. S., & Sunardi, S. (2015). The Potential of Pesantren In Sustainable Rural Development. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 3(2), 257-278.
Golose, P. R. (2010). Deradikalisasi Terorisme: Humanis, Soul Approach dan Menyentuh Akar Rumput. Yayasan Pengembangan Kajian Ilmu Kepolisian.
Hadi, A. (2017). The Internalization of Local Wisdom Value in Dayah Educational Institution. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 5(2), 189-200. doi:10.26811/peuradeun.v5i2.128
Harney, S. dan Rita Olivia. (2003). Civil Society and Civil Society Organizations in Indonesia. Geneva, Switzerland: International Labour Office. See http://www.ilo.org/ses
Hersey, Paul and Kenneth H. Blanchard. (2013). Kepemimpinan Birokrasi. Terjemahan oleh Harbani Pasolong. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Hikam, M.A.S. (2016). Peran Masyarakat Sipil Indonesia Membendung Radikalisme (Deradikalisasi). Jakarta: Kompas.
Huwaida, H. (2015). Change and Development in the Acehnese Dayah Salafi (A Case Study). Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 3(2), 279-294.
Keban, Yeremias. (2008). Enam Dimensi Strategis Administrasi Publik: Konsep, Teori, dan Isu. Yogyakarta: Gava Media.
Kooiman, Jan. (2012). Governing as Governance. California: SAGE Publications.
Kruglanski, A. W., Gelfand, M. J., Bélanger, J. J., Sheveland, A., Hetiarachchi, M., & Gunaratna, R. (2014). The Psychology of Radicalization and Deradicalization: How Significance Quest Impacts Violent Extremism: Processes of Radicalization and Deradicalization. Political Psychology, 35, 69–93. doi: 10.1111/pops.12163
Mahendra, Yusril Ihza. (1999). Modernisme dan Fundamentalisme dalam Politik Islam. Terjemahan Mun’im A Sirry. Jakarta: Paramadina.
Mukhlis, Maulana. (2018). Dinamika Collaborative Governance dalam Kebijakan Pemindahan Pusat Pemerintahan Provinsi Lampung Tahun 2004-2016. Disertasi Doktor Universitas Padjadjaran. Bandung: Program Pascasarjana Universitas Padjadjaran.
Mukri, Mohd. dan Imam Mustofa. (2019). Deradikalisasi Pemahaman Islam Di Indonesia Perspektif maqa>s}id al-syari>’ah al-Ghazali. Bandar Lampung: Proceeding of Raden Intan International Conference on Muslim Societies and Social Sciences (RIICMUSSS).
Mustofa, Imam dan Nurul Mahmudah. (2019). Radikalisasi dan Deradikalisasi Islam. Yogyakarta: IDEA Press.
Osborne, D., & Ted Gaebler. (1992). Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit Is Transforming the Public Sector from Schoolhouse to Statehouse. City Hall to Pentagon, Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
Purwanti, Nurul D. (2016). Collaborative Governance (Kebijakan Publik dan Pemerintahan Kolaboratif, Isu-Isu Kontemporer). Yogyakarta: Center for Policy & Management Studies FISIPOL Universitas Gadjah Mada.
Rabasa, A. (Ed.). (2010). Deradicalizing Islamist Extremists. RAND Corporation.
Striegher, J. L. (2013). The Radicalization of Terrorists. Salus Journal, 1(1).
Susanto, Eddy. (2007). Kemungkinan Munculnya Paham Islam Radikal di Pondok Pesantren. Jurnal Tadrîs. Volume 2. Nomor 1. Published by Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung, page 1-16.
Turmudi, Endah dan Riza Sihbudi. (2005). Islam dan Radikalisme di Indonesia. Jakarta: LIPI Press.
Wei-Skillern, J., & Silver, N. (2013). Four Network Principles for Collaboration Success. The Foundation Review, 5(1), 121–129. doi:10.4087/FOUNDATION REVIEW-D-12-00018.1
Yang, L. (2017). Types and Institutional Design Principles of Collaborative Governance in a Strong-Government Society: The Case Study of Desertification Control in Northern China. International Public Management Journal, 20(4), 586–623. doi:10.1080/10967494.2016.1141812
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Maulana Mukhlis, Syarief Makhya (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: (1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC-BY-SA) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal; (2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal; (3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website), as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
