Evaluation of Learning Outcome: The Comparison Between the Education Unit Level Curriculum (KTSP) and the 2013 Curriculum
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v9i2.510Keywords:
Evaluation, Learning Outcomes, KTSP, 2013 CurriculumAbstract
This study aimed to describe the comparative implementation of learning outcome evaluations applied at MTsN 1 Medan by using the 2013 KTSP and Curriculum 2013. The method used in this study was qualitative methodology. Data collection techniques consisted of observation, interviews, and documentation. The research findings indicated that the differences in the assessment of learning outcomes between the KTSP curriculum and 2013 curriculum include aspects of the application in the classroom, assessment aspects, aspects of the assessment system, aspects of assessment instruments, aspects of portfolio assessment concepts, aspects of report card format, aspects of value list format, aspects of competency achievement indicators, aspects of competency achievement indicators, aspects graduate competency standards, standard aspects of assessment and aspects of value ranges.
References
Ananda, R. (2018). The Effectiveness of the Implementation of the Case Methods in the Learning Evaluation Course at the State Islamic University of North Sumatera. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 6(1), 103-120. doi:10.26811/peuradeun.v6i1.171
Anderson, O.W. danKrathwohl, D.R. (2001) A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, New York; Longman.
Arikunto, Suharsimi. (2010). Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Ed. Revisi. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Hamalik, Oemar. (2014). Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Idris, S., Tabrani ZA, & Sulaiman, F. (2018). Critical Education Paradigm in the Perspective of Islamic Education. Advanced Science Letters, 24(11), 8226–8230. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2018.12529
Kunandar. (2007). Guru Profesional, Implementasi KTSP dan Persiapan Menghadapi Sertifikasi Guru. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Miles Matthew B. & Huberman A. Michael, (2002) Analisis Data Kualitatif: Buku Sumber tentang Metode-Metode Baru, Trans. Tjejep Rohendi Rohidi. Jakarta: UI Press.
Mulyasa, E. (2007). Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan, Suatu Panduan Praktis.Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Mulyasa, E. (2015)., Pengembangan dan Implementasi Kurikulum 2013, Bandung: Rosda Karya.
Musdiani, M. (2018). The Influence of Problem-Based Learning Model on Learning IPS. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 6(2), 267-276. doi:10.26811/peuradeun.v6i2.220
Mustapha, R., M. Nasir, M., & Sadrina, S. (2018). Project-Based Learning Evaluation from Students’ and Supervisors’ Perspectives: A Qualitative Research at Polytechnic Malaysia. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 6(3), 397-408. doi:10.26811/peuradeun.v6i3.238
Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional, Nomor 23 Tahun 2006, Tentang Standar Kompetensi Lulusan untuk Satuan Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Jakarta: Kemendiknas.
Thoha, Chabib. (2001). Teknik Evaluasi Pendidikan.Jakarta: Rajawali.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 14 Tahun 2005 Tentang Guru Dan Dosen
Yaumi, Muhamad. (2013). Prinsip-Prinsip Desain Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Kencana.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Rusydi Ananda (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: (1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC-BY-SA) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal; (2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal; (3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website), as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
