RELIGION, CHURCH, INTIMATE CITIZENSHIP AND GENDER EQUALITY
(An Analysis of Differences in Gender Equality Policies in European Catholic Countries)
Keywords:
Religion, Church, Gender Equality, European, CatholicAbstract
During the past decades, processes of (post)modernization have raised the importance of quality-of-life issues and related policies, resulting in a higher salience of intimate citizenship issues on the political agenda. The Catholic Church as an institution especially has been articulating strong positions on issues considered to be about personal and family morality, actively opposing liberalization of abortion or even contraception, assisted reproduction for non-married couples, and the extension of marriage rights to homosexual people. This paper will investigate to what extent the framing of a number of intimate citizenship issues (reproductive rights, abortion, same-sex marriage and divorce) by the Catholic Church resonates with the framing of these issues in Catholic countries that are members or candidate to the European Union, and whether the presence or absence of resonance is linked to the degree of religiosity of the population, the support for Catholic religious values or to the institutional strength of the Catholic Church. The analysis will show to what extent we find ‘Catholic’ frames in the various countries and how that is connected to the level of religiosity, the support for Catholic religious values or the institutional strength of the Catholic Church.
References
Burns, Gene. 2005. The moral veto. Framing contraception, abortion and cultural pluralism in the US. Cambridge University Press.
Durham, W Cole. 1996. Perspectives on Religious Liberty: A Comparative Framework. In: Religious Human Rights in Global Perspective. Legal Perspective. Ed. J.D. van der Vyver, J. Witte. Kluwer Law International, The Hague
European Parliament. 2006. Rights or Religion: Can the EP deliver? Joint meeting of the WG Sexual reproductive health, HIV/Aids and Development & the WG of Separation of Religion and Politics, 10th of October 2006
European Women’s Lobby. 2006. Religion and women’s human rights position paper of the European Women’s Lobby, 27 may 2006
Fox, J. 2004. The Religion and State Project, Bar Ilan University. Ramat Gan
Gorski, P.S. and A. Altinordu. 2008. After secularization? In: Annual Review of Sociology 34, 55-85
Halman, L. and others. 2008. Changing Values and Beliefs in 85 countries. Trends from the Values Surveys from 1981 to 2004. European Values Studies volume 11. Brill, Leiden.
Höllinger, Franz, Haller, Max and Valle-Höllinger, Adriana. 2007. Christian Religion, Society and the State in the modern World', Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 20:2,133-157
Homilía del Cardenal-Arzobispo de Madrid en la Fiesta de la Sagrada Familia de Nazaret. 2007. (Homily by the Madrid Cardinal-Archbishop in the Sacred Nazaret Family Party)
Hungarian Conference of Catholic Bishops. 2006. Opinion of the Hungarian Conference of Catholic Bishops on the Book of Family Law and Inheritance in the bill on the Civil Code .[A Ptk. Családjogi és Öröklési Könyve tervezetének véleményezése, Magyar Katolikus Püspöki Konferencia, Iustitia et Pax Bizottsága],
Italian Episcopal Conference. 2007. Note of the Permanent Episcopal Conference
on family based on marriage and on legislative initiatives regarding de facto unions [Nota del Consiglio Episcopale Permanente a riguardo della famiglia fondata sul matrimonio e di iniziative legislative in materia di unioni di fatto]
Minkenberg, Michael. 2002. Religion and Public Policy. Institutional, cultural and political impact on the shaping of abortion policies in Western democracies. In: Comparative political studies vol 35, no 2, march 2002 221-247
Pontifical Council for the Family. 2007. The family and human procreation. Vatican City
Riedel, S. 2008. Models of Church-State Relations in European Democracies. In: Journal of Religion in Europe.1, 251-272
Steven, Martin. 2009. Religious Lobbies in the European Union: from Dominant Church to Faith-Based Organisation?', In: Religion, State and Society, 37:1,181-191
Trujillo, Alfonso Lopez and Karl Romer. 2006. Family and Human Procreation, Vatican City: The Pontifical Council for the Family
Veit Bader, A. 2003. Taking religious pluralism seriously. Arguing for an institutional turn. In: Ethical Theory and Moral Practice. 6: 3–22
Verloo, Mieke. 2007. Multiple meanings of gender equality. A Critical Frame Analysis of Gender Policies in Europe. CEU Press: Budapest.
Walby, Sylvia. 2009. Globalization and Inequalities: Complexity and Contested Modernities, Sage
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: (1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC-BY-SA) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal; (2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal; (3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website), as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
