The Implications of Library Service Development on Students’ Satisfaction at the State Islamic University in Indonesia
Abstract
This research focused on (1) the development of library services at the State Islamic University (hereafter UIN) in Indonesia, and (2) the implications of library services for students’ learning satisfaction at UIN in Indonesia. This research used mix-methods using a purposive sampling technique. The samples were three library directors, 12 librarians, and 345 students. Data collections involved interviews, observations, and questionnaires, while the data were analyzed using a descriptive approach. The results showed that UIN in Indonesia developed the library services through planning, developing facilities, improving librarian competencies, enhancing the collaboration or network between libraries, and developing the library services. The results also revealed that the quality of library services at UIN in Indonesia was categorized as good, with an average of 76.62%. In contrast, the level of student satisfaction concerning the library services of UIN was classified as satisfactory, with an average of 76.91%. The library services had a strong implication on UIN students’ satisfaction, with a correlation coefficient of 0.765. This means that library services have a strong relationship with UIN students’ learning satisfaction in Indonesia.
References
Barmawi, I. (2012). Mengenal Lebih Dekat Perpustakaan Perguruan Tinggi. Iqra’: Jurnal Perpustakaan Dan Informasi, 6(1), 49–61.
Creswell. (2018). Research and Design Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. In Thousand Oaks California.
Dwijati, S. (2006). Upaya Meningkatkan Kualitas Jasa Layanan Informasi di Perpustakaan. Buletin Perpustakaan Universitas Airlangga. Universitas Airlangga, 16–20.
Fitriyani, E., & Pramusinto, H. (2018). Pengaruh Fasilitas Perpustakaan, Kualitas Pelayanan, Dan Kinerja Pustakawan Terhadap Minat Berkunjung Masyarakat. Economic Education Analysis Journal, 7(2), 73–84.
Fitriani, N., & Sabarniati, S. (2019). A Feedback Investigation of Comparing Teacher and Students’ Preferences on Writing Conference in a Novice EFL Writing Class. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 7(2), 315-330. doi:10.26811/peuradeun.v7i2.304
Harmoko, S. (2017). Analisis Tingkat Kepuasan Pemustaka Terhadap Kualitas Layanan Di Perpustakaan Politeknik Kesehatan Kementerian Kesehatan Yogyakarta. Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan Dan Informasi, 2(2), 164–188.
Hunt, et. al. (2011). National Strategy for Higher Education to 2030. Department of Education and Skills and the Government Publications Sales Office.
Idris, S., Tabrani ZA, & Sulaiman, F. (2018). Critical Education Paradigm in the Perspective of Islamic Education. Advanced Science Letters, 24(11), 8226–8230. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2018.12529
Ismiyati, et. al. (2016). Pengaruh Fasilitas Perpustakaan Dan Pelayanan Perpustakaan Terhadap Minat Membaca Di Perpustakaan. Economic Education Analysis Journal, 5(2), 456–467.
Kurniasih, N. (2018). Analisis Pengaruh Pelayanan Perpustakaan Terhadap Kepuasan Pengguna Perpustakaan Di Institut Agama Islam Imam Ghozali. Jurnal Tawadhu, 447468.
Mehmood, et. al. (2015). Quality of Branchless Banking Service in Lahore City: Application of Servequal Model. Science International. Science International, 27(2), 1487–1491.
Moleong. (2013). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Remaja Rosda Karya.
Mulyana, et. al. (2013). Analisis Pengaruh Kualitas Pelayanan Perpustakaan Terhadap Kepuasan dan Hubungannya dengan Loyalitas Mahasiswa. Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Kesatuan, 1(1), 91–105.
Novianti, et. al. (2015). Pengaruh Kualitas Pelayanan Terhadap Kepuasan Pemustaka (Studi pada Perpustakaan Umum dan Arsip Kota Malang). Jurnal Administrasi Publik (JAP), 3(5), 789–794.
Patimah, S., & Tabrani ZA. (2018). Counting Methodology on Educational Return Investment. Advanced Science Letters, 24(10), 7087–7089. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2018.12414
Putri, M. K., & Maralis, R. (2019). Analisis Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Di Perpustakaan Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Indragiri (STIE-I) Rengat Kabupaten Indragiri Hulu. Jurnal Manajemen Dan Bisnis, 8(1), 70–85. https://doi.org/10.34006/jmbi.v8i1.55
Rahayu, S. (2017). Mengenal Perpustakaan Perguruan Tinggi Lebih Dekat. Buletin Perpustakaan Universitas Islam Indonesia, 57, 103–110. https://journal.uii.ac.id/Buletin-Perpustakaan/article/view/9109/7603
Rambat. (2001). Manajemen Pemasaran Jasa: Teori dan Praktek. Salemba Empat.
Simosir, Z. Z. (2005). Pengaruh Kualitas Pelayanan Terhadap Kepuasan Mahasiswa Menggunakan Perpustakaan USU. Jurnal Studi Perpustakaan Dan Informasi, 1(1), 28–36.
Siregar. (2004). Perpustakaan: Energi Pembangunan Bangsa. USU Press.
Soerjaningsih, T. W. (2004). Peningkatan Mutu Proses Perguruan Tinggi Melalui Sistem Mutu ISO 9000. Journal The Winners, 5(2), 79–89.
Sugiyono. (2011). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Sulaiman. (2015). Classroom Management and the Implications to Quality of Learning. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 3(3), 431–440.
Walidin, W., Idris, S., & Tabrani ZA. (2015). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif & Grounded Theory. Banda Aceh: FTK Ar-Raniry Press.
Winarsis, et. al. (2005). Manajemen Pelayanan. Pustaka Pelajar.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: (1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC-BY-SA) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal; (2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal; (3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
